ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2019
Serious adverse events and lifetime risk of reoperation after elective shoulder replacement: population based cohort study using hospital episode statistics for England.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03573765 (The Role of Patient Factors, Surgical Factors and Hospital Factors Upon Patient Outcomes and NHS Costs in the Treatment of Upper Limb Musculoskeletal Conditions), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Role of Patient Factors, Surgical Factors and Hospital Factors Upon Patient Outcomes and NHS Costs in the Treatment of Upper Limb Musculoskeletal Conditions: Spatial and Iongitudinal Analysis of Routine Data
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following total shoulder replacement: A systematic review.Clinical rehabilitation · 2022Pooled it
- Bridging Allograft Reconstruction Is Superior to Maximal Repair for the Treatment of Chronic, Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: Results of a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.The American journal of sports medicine · 2021Trial
- Performance Measurement for Surgery at National Level in China.Health care science · 2026Article
- Outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a day case procedure: a population-based cohort study using the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026Article
- Epidemiological Trends and Age-Related Outcomes in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Analysis of 9692 Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Risk factors for coracoclavicular reconstruction failure: a systematic review.JSES international · 2025Review
- Article
- Serious adverse events, readmission, and mortality after shoulder replacement due to fracture, osteoarthritis, and other indications: a population-based comparison with the general population.Acta orthopaedica · 2025Article
- Article
- Informed Consent in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery.Cureus · 2025Review
- Re-revision following revision of a failed primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics for England.JSES international · 2025Article
- Revision of reverse shoulder arthroplasty by indication : a National Joint Registry study.Bone & joint open · 2025Article
- Ream-and-run technique offers equivalent clinical outcomes as anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty but with a high rate of complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Review
- A comparative study of shoulder replacement outcomes using linked national registry and hospital data from England and Denmark.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness of total shoulder arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty: a study using data from the National Joint Registry.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Association between socioeconomic status and patient-reported outcome at 1 year after shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis or cuff-tear arthropathy: a nationwide cohort study of 2,292 arthroplasties.Acta orthopaedica · 2025Article
- Article
- Is there a difference in thresholds for revision between shoulder arthroplasty types? A National Joint Registry Study.PloS one · 2025Article
- High comorbidity burden and low incidence of adverse events in primary shoulder arthroplasty in tertiary care at a university hospital.Journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Fungal Shoulder Periprosthetic Infections: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo provide accurate risk estimates of serious adverse events after elective shoulder replacement surgery for arthritis, including age and sex specific estimates of the lifetime risk of revision surgery.
designPopulation based cohort study.
settingHospital episode statistics for NHS England, including civil registration mortality data.
participants58 054 elective shoulder replacements in 51 895 adults (aged ≥50 years) between April 1998 and April 2017.
main outcome measuresThe lifetime risk of revision surgery, calculated using an actuarial life table approach and the cumulative probability method. Rates of serious adverse events at 30 and 90 days post-surgery: pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, lower respiratory tract infection, acute kidney injury, urinary tract infection, cerebrovascular events, and all cause death. Secondary outcome measures were the number of surgeries performed each year and Kaplan-Meier estimates of revision risk at 3, 5, 10, and 15 years.
resultsThe number of shoulder replacements performed each year increased 5.6-fold between 1998 and 2017. Lifetime risks of revision surgery ranged from 1 in 37 (2.7%, 95% confidence interval 2.6% to 2.8%) in women aged 85 years and older to 1 in 4 (23.6%, 23.2% to 24.0%) in men aged 55-59 years. The risks of revision were highest during the first five years after surgery. The risk of any serious adverse event at 30 days post-surgery was 1 in 28 (3.5%, 3.4% to 3.7%), and at 90 days post-surgery was 1 in 22 (4.6%, 4.4% to 4.8%). At 30 days, the relative risk of pulmonary embolism compared with baseline population risk was 61 (95% confidence interval 50 to 73) for women aged 50-64. Serious adverse events were associated with increasing age, comorbidity, and male sex. 1 in 5 (21.2%, 17.9% to 25.1%) men aged 85 years and older experienced at least one serious adverse event within 90 days.
conclusionsYounger patients, particularly men, need to be aware of a higher likelihood of early failure of shoulder replacement and the need for further and more complex revision replacement surgery. All patients should be counselled about the risks of serious adverse events. These risks are higher than previously considered, and for some could outweigh any potential benefits. Our findings caution against unchecked expansion of shoulder replacement surgery in both younger and older patients. The more accurate age and sex specific estimates of risk from this study are long overdue and should improve shared decision making between patients and clinicians. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03573765.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.