Evidence mapPaperPMID 30788807Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2019

C-Peptide Area Under the Curve at Glucagon Stimulation Test Predicts Glucose Improvements by GLP-1 Receptor Analogue: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Azusa Ohbatake, Kunimasa Yagi, Shigehiro Karashima, Yuki Shima, Yukiko Miyamoto, Hiroyuki Asaka, Satoko Okazaki, Mitsuhiro Kometani, Masa-Aki Kawashiri, Yoshiyu Takeda and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Azusa OhbatakeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan.
Kunimasa YagiFirst Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Shigehiro KarashimaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan.
Yuki ShimaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan.
Yukiko MiyamotoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan.
Hiroyuki AsakaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan.
Satoko OkazakiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan.
Mitsuhiro KometaniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan.
Masa-Aki KawashiriDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan.
Yoshiyu TakedaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan.
Takashi YonedaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan.
Daisuke ChujoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan. dchujo@hosp.ncgm.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7727-6310
Kanazawa University · JPUniversity of Toyama · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite the widespread use of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (GLP-1ras) to improve glycemic regulation, with a low risk of hypoglycemia and weight reduction, their effectiveness varies among individuals. This study aimed to identify predictors of the efficacy of GLP-1ra on Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in patients with insulin-independent diabetes.

methodsIn total, 58 patients with insulin-independent diabetes were included. Patients were included if their β-cell function was evaluated via a glucagon stimulation test (GST) before the introduction of GLP-1ra therapy. β-Cell function-related indices, such as the C-peptide index (CPI), increments in C-peptide immunoreactivity (CPR) after glucagon stimulation (ΔCPR), and the area under the CPR curve (CPR-AUC) during the GST, were evaluated. HbA1c and body weight (BW) were measured at 6 and 12 months after the initiation of GLP-1ra.

resultsA univariate regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between CPR-AUC and changes in HbA1c at 6 months and with changes in BW at 6 and 12 months. A multivariate regression analysis revealed that CPR-AUC was significantly correlated with changes in HbA1c at 6 months. A receiver-operating characteristic analysis revealed that 21.9 ng/ml·min CPR-AUC was the optimal cut-off value to predict an HbA1c level < 7%, i.e., 53 mmol/mol.

conclusionResidual β-cell function, as assessed via CPR-AUC in the GST, is an effective predictor of the efficacy of GLP-1ras.

Indexed as

C-peptideGLP-1 receptor agonistGlucagon stimulation testInsulin-independent diabetesLiraglutideLixisenatide

Identifiers

PMID30788807
PMCPMC6437227
OpenAlexW2916927012

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.