Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30794591›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Feasibility of integrated, multilevel care for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and HIV in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): A scoping review.

Temitope Ojo, Lynette Lester, Juliet Iwelunmor, Joyce Gyamfi, Chisom Obiezu-Umeh, Deborah Onakomaiya, Angela Aifah, Shreya Nagendra, Jumoke Opeyemi, Mofetoluwa Oluwasanmi and 5 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Temitope OjoDepartment of Epidemiology, New York University College of Global Public Health, New York, New York, United States of America.
Lynette LesterNew York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Juliet IwelunmorDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, College for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Joyce GyamfiSection for Global Health, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Chisom Obiezu-UmehDepartment of Epidemiology, New York University College of Global Public Health, New York, New York, United States of America.
Deborah OnakomaiyaSection for Global Health, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Angela AifahSection for Global Health, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Shreya NagendraDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, College for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Jumoke OpeyemiDepartment of Epidemiology, New York University College of Global Public Health, New York, New York, United States of America.
Mofetoluwa OluwasanmiDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, College for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Milena DaltonSection for Global Health, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Ucheoma NwaozuruDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, College for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Dorice VieiraDepartment of Epidemiology, New York University College of Global Public Health, New York, New York, United States of America.
Gbenga OgedegbeSection for Global Health, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Bernadette Boden-AlbalaDepartment of Epidemiology, New York University College of Global Public Health, New York, New York, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntegrated cardiovascular disease (CVD) and HIV (CVD-HIV) care interventions are being adopted to tackle the growing burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) but there is a paucity of studies on the feasibility of these interventions in LMICs. This scoping review aims to present evidence of the feasibility of integrated CVD-HIV care in LMICs, and the alignment of feasibility reporting in LMICs with the existing implementation science methodology.

methodsA systematic search of published articles including systematic and narrative reviews that reported on integrated CVD-HIV care was conducted, using multiple search engines including PubMed/Medline, Global Health, and Web of Science. We examined the articles for evidence of feasibility reporting. Adopting the definition of Proctor and colleagues (2011), feasibility was defined as the extent to which an intervention was plausible in a given agency or setting. Evidence from the articles was synthesized by level of integration, the chronic care continuum, and stages of intervention development.

resultsTwenty studies, reported in 18 articles and 3 conferences abstracts, reported on feasibility of integrated CVD-HIV care interventions. These studies were conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia and South America. Four of these studies were conducted as feasibility studies. Eighty percent of the studies reported feasibility, using descriptive sentences that included words synonymous with feasibility terminologies in existing definition recommended by Proctor and colleagues. There was also an overlap in the use of descriptive phrases for feasibility amongst the selected studies.

conclusionsIntegrating CVD and HIV care is feasible in LMICs, although methodology for reporting feasibility is inconsistent. Assessing feasibility based on settings and integration goals will provide a unique perspective of the implementation landscape in LMICs. There is a need for consistency in measures in order to accurately assess the feasibility of integrated CVD-HIV care in LMICs.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedInterdisciplinary CommunicationCardiovascular DiseasesDeveloping CountriesFeasibility StudiesHIVHIV InfectionsHumans

Identifiers

PMID30794591
PMCPMC6386271

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.