Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30798284›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2019

Effect of fenofibrate on plasma apolipoprotein C-III levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials.

Amirhossein Sahebkar, Luis E Simental-Mendía, Niki Katsiki, Željko Reiner, Maciej Banach, Matteo Pirro, Stephen L Atkin

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Fenofibrate-induced renal dysfunction, yes or no?Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Amirhossein SahebkarBiotechnology Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Luis E Simental-MendíaBiomedical Research Unit, Mexican Social Security Institute, Durango, Mexico.
Niki KatsikiSecond Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Hippocration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Željko ReinerDepartment of Internal medicine, University Hospital Center Zagreb, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Maciej BanachDepartment of Hypertension, WAM University Hospital in Lodz, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Matteo PirroUnit of Internal Medicine, Angiology and Arteriosclerosis Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Stephen L AtkinWeill Cornell Medicine Qatar, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-5887-7257
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRMashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRMedical University of Lodz · PLMexican Social Security Institute · MXUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb · HRUniversity of Perugia · ITWeill Cornell Medical College in Qatar · QA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled clinical trials aimed to assess the effect of fenofibrate on apolipoprotein C-III (apo C-III), a key regulator of triglyceride metabolism. MATERIALS AND

methodsRandomised placebo-controlled trials investigating the impact of fenofibrate treatment on apo C-III levels were searched in PubMed-Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases from inception to 18 August 2017. Quantitative data synthesis was determined by a random-effects model and generic inverse variance method. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using the leave-one-out method. A weighted random-effects meta-regression was performed to evaluate glycaemic parameter confounders.

resultsMeta-analysis of 10 clinical trials involving 477 subjects showed fenofibrate therapy decreased apo C-III levels (weighted mean difference (WMD) -4.78 mg/dL, 95% CI -6.95 to -2.61, p<0.001; I

conclusionThis meta-analysis found that fenofibrate therapy significantly decreases apo C-III levels, an effect evident with both short-term treatment and doses less than 200 mg/day.

Indexed as

Apolipoprotein C-IIICardiovascular DiseasesFenofibrateHumansHypertriglyceridemiaHypolipidemic AgentsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicApolipoprotein C-IIIFenofibrateHypolipidemic Agentsapolipoprotein Cfenofibratefibratemeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID30798284
PMCPMC6278807
OpenAlexW2903254024

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.