ArticleJournal of geriatric cardiology : JGC2019
Factors associated with intensification of antihypertensive drug therapy in patients with poorly controlled hypertension.
Article in Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors of undiagnosed and uncontrolled hypertension in primary care patients with hypertension: a cross-sectional study.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Advances in Journal of Geriatric Cardiology over the course of a decade.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess antihypertensive management of older patients with poor blood pressure (BP) control.
methodsPhysicians, voluntary participating in the study, included six consecutive hypertensive patients during routine visits. Hypertension had to have been previously recognized and averaged office BP was ≥ 140 and/or ≥ 90 mmHg in spite of ≥ 6 weeks of antihypertensive therapy. The physicians completed a questionnaire on patients' history of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, comorbidities, home BP monitoring, anthropometric data and the pharmacotherapy.
resultsMean age of the 6462 patients was 61 years, 7% were ≥ 80 years, 51% were female. Mean ± SD office BP values were 158 ± 13/92 ± 10 mmHg. The most commonly prescribed antihypertensive drugs were: diuretics (67%), ACE inhibitors (64%), calcium channel blockers (58%) and β-blockers (54%), and their use increased with age. On monotherapy or dual therapy, 43% of the patients and 40% had their latest treatment modification within six months. Home BP monitoring was a factor that accelerated the modification of the therapy. Older patients had to have less chance on faster modification of antihypertensive therapy in spite of presence of diabetes and higher systolic BP.
conclusionsOur study suggests that a large number of outpatients with poor BP control receive suboptimal antihypertensive therapy, especially in primary care. In older patients, higher BP values in the office settings are more frequently accepted by physicians even in case of higher CV risk. Regular home BP monitoring hastens the decision to intensify of antihypertensive treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.