Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30801686›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2019

Cardiac β

Ebru Arioglu-Inan, Gizem Kayki-Mutlu, Martin C Michel

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Physiological and metabolic functions of the βJournal of physiology and biochemistry · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Status of βReviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Review
  7. Mirabegron Ameliorated Atherosclerosis of ApoECardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Upregulation of βNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  14. Adrenoceptors-New roles for old players.British journal of pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  15. Cardiac βBritish journal of pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ebru Arioglu-InanDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0860-0815
Gizem Kayki-MutluDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3177-9438
Martin C MichelDepartment of Pharmacology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4161-8467
Ankara University · TRJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As β

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AgonistsCardiovascular DiseasesHumansReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-3Adrenergic beta-AgonistsReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-3

Identifiers

PMID30801686
PMCPMC6592859
OpenAlexW2916935088

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.