Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30815536›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2019

Extended resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA)-induced type 2 myocardial ischemia: a time-dependent penalty.

Philip J Wasicek, William A Teeter, Shiming Yang, Hector Banchs, Samuel M Galvagno, Peter Hu, William B Gamble, Melanie R Hoehn, Thomas M Scalea, Jonathan J Morrison

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock and blunt thoracic injury.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Philip J WasicekR Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
William A TeeterR Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Shiming YangShock, Trauma, and Anesthesiology Research Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Hector BanchsDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Samuel M GalvagnoShock, Trauma, and Anesthesiology Research Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Peter HuShock, Trauma, and Anesthesiology Research Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
William B GambleR Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Melanie R HoehnR Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Thomas M ScaleaR Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jonathan J MorrisonR Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7462-8456
International Trauma Anesthesia and Critical Care Society · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) increases cardiac-afterload and is used for patients in hemorrhagic shock. The cardiac tolerance of prolonged afterload augmentation in this context is unknown. The aim of this study is to quantify cardiac injury, if any, following 2, 3 and 4 hours of REBOA.

methodsAnesthetized swine (70-90 kg) underwent a 40% controlled hemorrhage, followed by supraceliac resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for 2 (n=5), 3 (n=5), and 4 hours (n=5). High-fidelity arterial wave form data were collected, and signal processing techniques were used to extract key inflection points. The adjusted augmentation index (AIx@75; augmentation pressure/pulse pressure, normalized for heart rate) was derived for use as a measure of aortic compliance (higher ratio = less compliance). Endpoints consisted of electrocardiographic, biochemical, and histologic markers of myocardial injury/ischemia. Regression modeling was used to assess the trend against time.

resultsAll animals tolerated instrumentation, hemorrhage, and REBOA. The mean (±SD) systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) increased from 65±11 to 212±39 (p<0.001) during REBOA. The AIx@75 was significantly higher during REBOA than baseline, hemorrhage, and resuscitation phases (p<0.05). A time-dependent rise in troponin (R DISCUSSION: Prolonged REBOA may result in type 2 myocardial ischemia, which is time-dependent. This has important implications for patients where prolonged REBOA may be considered beneficial, and strategies to mitigate this effect require further investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Indexed as

aortic occlusionarterial waveformcardiaccardiac injuryhemorrhageischemiareboaresuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta

Identifiers

PMID30815536
PMCPMC6361364
OpenAlexW2914469506

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.