Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30824793›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Feature-tracking myocardial strain in healthy adults- a magnetic resonance study at 3.0 tesla.

Kenneth Mangion, Nicole M M Burke, Christie McComb, David Carrick, Rosemary Woodward, Colin Berry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance reference values ("normal values") in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: 2025 update.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Left ventricular functional recovery of infarcted and remote myocardium after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (METOCARD-CNIC randomized clinical trial substudy).Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2020
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kenneth MangionBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3505-7440
Nicole M M BurkeBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Christie McCombBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
David CarrickWest of Scotland Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, UK.
Rosemary WoodwardBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Colin BerryBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. colin.berry@glasgow.ac.uk.

Funding

RETROVIRAL MEDIATED GENE TRANSFER INTO BONE MARROW CELLSK08HL001554 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI WILLIAMS, DAVID A · 1985 to 1989
–
British Heart Foundation FS/15/54/31639British Heart Foundation PG/14/64/31043British Heart Foundation (BHF) FS/15/54/31639British Heart Foundation (BHF) PG/14/64/31043Chief Scientist Office SCD/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We analyzed feature-tracking derived circumferential and longitudinal strain in healthy volunteers who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) at 3.0 T. 88 healthy adults (44.6 ± 18.0 years old, 49% male), without prior cardiovascular disease, underwent CMR at 3.0 T including cine, and late gadolinium enhancement in subjects >45 years. LV functional analysis and feature-tracking strain analyses were carried out. Global strain had better reproducibility than segmental strain. There was a sex specific difference global longitudinal strain (mean ± SD, -18.48 ± 3.65% (male), -21.91 ± 3.01% (female), p < 0.001), but not global circumferential strain (mean ± SD, -25.41 ± 4.50% (male), -27.94 ± 3.48% (female), p = 0.643). There was no association of strain with ageing after accounting for sex for both global longitudinal and circumferential strain. Feature-tracking strain analysis is feasible at 3.0 T. Healthy female volunteers demonstrated higher magnitudes of global longitudinal strain when compared to male counterparts. Whilst global cine-strain has good reproducibility, segmental strain does not.

Indexed as

HealthMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgingFemaleHeartHumansMaleMyocardiumObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsSex CharacteristicsVentricular Function

Identifiers

PMID30824793
PMCPMC6397185

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.