Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30825375›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2019

A framework for genomics-informed ecophysiological modeling in plants.

Diane R Wang, Carmela R Guadagno, Xiaowei Mao, D Scott Mackay, Jonathan R Pleban, Robert L Baker, Cynthia Weinig, Jean-Luc Jannink, Brent E Ewers

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genome-Enabled Prediction Methods Based on Machine Learning.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Positive effects of public breeding on US rice yields under future climate scenarios.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Rapid ChlorophyllPlant physiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Diane R WangGeography Department, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Carmela R GuadagnoBotany Department, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.
Xiaowei MaoPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
D Scott MackayGeography Department, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Jonathan R PlebanGeography Department, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Robert L BakerBiology Department, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA.
Cynthia WeinigBotany Department, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.
Jean-Luc JanninkPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Brent E EwersBotany Department, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of Wyoming · USCornell University · USMiami University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic process-based plant models capture complex physiological response across time, carrying the potential to extend simulations out to novel environments and lend mechanistic insight to observed phenotypes. Despite the translational opportunities for varietal crop improvement that could be unlocked by linking natural genetic variation to first principles-based modeling, these models are challenging to apply to large populations of related individuals. Here we use a combination of model development, experimental evaluation, and genomic prediction in Brassica rapa L. to set the stage for future large-scale process-based modeling of intraspecific variation. We develop a new canopy growth submodel for B. rapa within the process-based model Terrestrial Regional Ecosystem Exchange Simulator (TREES), test input parameters for feasibility of direct estimation with observed phenotypes across cultivated morphotypes and indirect estimation using genomic prediction on a recombinant inbred line population, and explore model performance on an in silico population under non-stressed and mild water-stressed conditions. We find evidence that the updated whole-plant model has the capacity to distill genotype by environment interaction (G×E) into tractable components. The framework presented offers a means to link genetic variation with environment-modulated plant response and serves as a stepping stone towards large-scale prediction of unphenotyped, genetically related individuals under untested environmental scenarios.

Indexed as

EcosystemGenomicsGenotypeModels, GeneticPlantsStress, PhysiologicalAbiotic stressdevelopmentG×Egenomic predictiongrowthprocess-based models

Identifiers

PMID30825375
PMCPMC6487588
OpenAlexW2950836373

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.