Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30826768›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Treatment patterns, persistence and adherence rates in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japan: a claims-based cohort study.

Rimei Nishimura, Haruka Kato, Koichi Kisanuki, Akinori Oh, Shinzo Hiroi, Yoshie Onishi, Florent Guelfucci, Yukio Shimasaki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rimei NishimuraThe Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Haruka KatoJapan Medical Affairs, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3270-6687
Koichi KisanukiJapan Medical Affairs, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan.
Akinori OhJapan Medical Affairs, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinzo HiroiJapan Medical Affairs, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshie OnishiCreativ-Ceutical, Japan Operations, Tokyo, Japan.
Florent GuelfucciCreativ-Ceutical, Paris, France.
Yukio ShimasakiJapan Medical Affairs, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeda (Japan) · JPCreativ-Ceutical (France) · FRJikei University School of Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine real-world trends in antidiabetic drug use, and persistence and adherence, in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

designRetrospective evaluation of administrative claims data (2011-2015) using the Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC) and Medical Data Vision (MDV) databases.

settingAnalysis of two administrative claims databases for Japanese patients with T2DM.

participantsAdults (aged ≥18 years) with an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision code of T2DM and at least one antidiabetic drug prescription.

main outcome measuresTreatment patterns in untreated (UT) or previously treated (PT) patients receiving antidiabetic therapy; persistence with treatment at 12 months; adherence to treatment at 12 months.

results40 908 and 90 421 patients were included from the JMDC and MDV databases, respectively. The most frequently prescribed therapy at the index (first prescription) date was dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) in UT patients (JMDC: 44.0%, MDV: 54.8%) and combination therapy in PT patients (74.6%, 81.1%). Most common combinations were DPP-4i plus: biguanide (BG; 11.4%, 10.9%), sulfonylurea (SU; 8.4%, 11.0%) or BG+SU (7.8%, 9.1%). In UT or PT patients from either database whose index prescription was for any antidiabetic drug class(es) other than DPP-4i, the most frequent add-on or switch was to DPP-4i. 12-month persistence with index monotherapy was highest with DPP-4i and BG. Adherence was high (≥80%) for all monotherapy schedules, except insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist, and for the five most frequent two-drug and three-drug combinations. Persistence was greater in elderly UT patients and in those receiving ≤5 medications, but comparatively worse in UT patients with ≥3 index antidiabetic drug classes.

conclusionsThe findings indicate that DPP-4i is the most commonly used antidiabetic drug class in Japanese patients with T2DM, and persistence and adherence to this antidiabetic drug class are high.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drug CombinationsDrug SubstitutionFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsJapanMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDrug CombinationsHypoglycemic Agentsadherenceadministrative claims-based studyantidiabetic drug therapydipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitorspersistencetype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID30826768
PMCPMC6429930
OpenAlexW2919521397

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.