Evidence mapPaperPMID 30849253Full record

SynthesisThe European journal of general practice2019

Impact of non-drug therapies on asthma control: A systematic review of the literature.

Matthieu Schuers, Anthony Chapron, Hugo Guihard, Tiphanie Bouchez, David Darmon

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The European journal of general practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Indoor bioaerosols and asthma: Overview, implications, and mitigation strategies.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Questions in Mild Asthma: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. 2021 Brazilian Thoracic Association recommendations for the management of severe asthma.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthieu Schuersa Department of General Medicine , Rouen University , Rouen , France.
Anthony Chapronb Department of General Medicine , Rennes University , Rennes , France.
Hugo Guiharda Department of General Medicine , Rouen University , Rouen , France.
Tiphanie Bouchezc Department of General Medicine , Nice University , Nice , France.
David Darmonc Department of General Medicine , Nice University , Nice , France.
Université Côte d'Azur · FRUniversité de Rouen Normandie · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite growing access to effective therapies, asthma control still needs improvement. Many non-drug factors, such as allergens, air pollutants and stress also affect asthma control and patient quality of life, but an overview of the effectiveness of non-drug interventions on asthma control was lacking.

objectivesTo identify non-drug interventions likely to improve asthma control.

methodsA systematic review of the available literature in Medline and the Cochrane Library was conducted in March 2017, without any time limit. Initial searching identified 884 potentially relevant clinical trial reports, literature reviews and meta-analyses, which were screened for inclusion using criteria of quality, relevance, and reporting outcomes based on asthma control.

resultsEighty-two publications met the inclusion criteria. In general, the quality of the studies was low. Patient education programmes (22 studies) significantly improved asthma control. Multifaceted interventions (10 studies), which combined patient education programmes with decreasing exposure to indoor allergens and pollutants, significantly improved asthma control based on clinically relevant outcomes. Renovating homes to reduce exposure to allergens and indoor pollutants improved control (two studies). Air filtration systems (five studies) were effective, especially in children exposed to second-hand smoke. Most measures attempting to reduce exposure to dust mites were ineffective (five studies). Dietary interventions (eight studies) were ineffective. Promoting physical activity (five studies) tended to yield positive results, but the results did not attain significance.

conclusionTwenty-six interventions were effective in asthma control. Simultaneously combining several action plans, each focusing on different aspects of asthma management, seems most likely to be effective.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAir FiltersAir PollutantsAllergensAsthmaChildHumansStress, PsychologicalAir PollutantsAllergensAsthmachronic diseasesystematic reviewtherapy

Identifiers

PMID30849253
PMCPMC6493294
OpenAlexW2922307252

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.