SynthesisThe European journal of general practice2019
Impact of non-drug therapies on asthma control: A systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in The European journal of general practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- A randomized controlled trial of adjunctive speleotherapy in asthma, COPD and long COVID.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Indoor bioaerosols and asthma: Overview, implications, and mitigation strategies.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2025Review
- Evaluating the Impact of a Teaching Program on the Knowledge, Quality of Life, and Symptoms Among Asthmatic Children.Cureus · 2025Article
- Effect of high-efficiency particulate air filter on children with asthma: a systematic review protocol of RCTs.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Preclinical Evaluation of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) to Predict Poor Control of Chronic Respiratory Diseases in Primary Care: A Novel Approach to Focus Our Efforts.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Non-pharmacological interventions for asthma prevention and management across the life course: Umbrella review.Clinical and translational allergy · 2024Review
- Questions in Mild Asthma: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023Article
- Basis of preventive and non-pharmacological interventions in asthma.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Multimorbidity in Difficult Asthma: The Need for Personalised and Non-Pharmacological Approaches to Address a Difficult Breathing Syndrome.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Benefits outweigh the risks: a consensus statement on the risks of physical activity for people living with long-term conditions.British journal of sports medicine · 2022Article
- 2021 Brazilian Thoracic Association recommendations for the management of severe asthma.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2021Review
- Winter Exercise and Speleotherapy for Allergy and Asthma: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite growing access to effective therapies, asthma control still needs improvement. Many non-drug factors, such as allergens, air pollutants and stress also affect asthma control and patient quality of life, but an overview of the effectiveness of non-drug interventions on asthma control was lacking.
objectivesTo identify non-drug interventions likely to improve asthma control.
methodsA systematic review of the available literature in Medline and the Cochrane Library was conducted in March 2017, without any time limit. Initial searching identified 884 potentially relevant clinical trial reports, literature reviews and meta-analyses, which were screened for inclusion using criteria of quality, relevance, and reporting outcomes based on asthma control.
resultsEighty-two publications met the inclusion criteria. In general, the quality of the studies was low. Patient education programmes (22 studies) significantly improved asthma control. Multifaceted interventions (10 studies), which combined patient education programmes with decreasing exposure to indoor allergens and pollutants, significantly improved asthma control based on clinically relevant outcomes. Renovating homes to reduce exposure to allergens and indoor pollutants improved control (two studies). Air filtration systems (five studies) were effective, especially in children exposed to second-hand smoke. Most measures attempting to reduce exposure to dust mites were ineffective (five studies). Dietary interventions (eight studies) were ineffective. Promoting physical activity (five studies) tended to yield positive results, but the results did not attain significance.
conclusionTwenty-six interventions were effective in asthma control. Simultaneously combining several action plans, each focusing on different aspects of asthma management, seems most likely to be effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.