ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2019
Prediction of maximal oxygen consumption using the Young Men's Christian Association-step test in Korean adults.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic exercise and neuropsychological function in healthy young adults: a randomised controlled trial investigating a running intervention.Cognitive processing · 2024Trial
- Article
- Establish VOInternational journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Feasibility of predicting maximal oxygen uptake by using the efficiency factor in healthy men.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Estimation methods to detect changes in cardiorespiratory fitness due to exercise training and subsequent detraining.European journal of applied physiology · 2023Article
- Improved VOJournal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Article
- The Determination of Step Frequency in 3-min Incremental Step-in-Place Tests for Predicting Maximal Oxygen Uptake from Heart Rate Response in Taiwanese Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- The Effects of Traditional versus Ability-Based Physical Training on the Health and Fitness of Custody Assistant Recruits.International journal of exercise science · 2022Article
- The Health and Fitness Characteristics of Civilian Jailer Recruits Prior to Academy Training.International journal of exercise science · 2022Article
- Contribution of Body Mass Index Stratification for the Prediction of Maximal Oxygen Uptake.International journal of medical sciences · 2022Article
- Development and Validation of 3 Min Incremental Step-In-Place Test for Predicting Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Home Settings: A Submaximal Exercise Study to Assess Cardiorespiratory Fitness.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- How Does Time Spent Working in Custody Influence Health and Fitness Characteristics of Law Enforcement Officers?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Criterion-Related Validity of Field-Based Fitness Tests in Adults: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Article
- The Influence of Aerobic Fitness on Heart Rate Responses of Custody Assistant Recruits during Circuit Training Sessions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop accurate and practical prediction models of maximal oxygen consumption (VO
methodsIn total, 568 adults (20-66 years) were included in this study. To develop and cross-validate prediction models of VO
resultsThe average age and VO
conclusionsThe prediction models included 3-5 variables as significant predictors of VO
Indexed as
Identifiers
30850877What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.