Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30854792›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy2019

New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus in Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis Patients: Frequency, Risk Factors, and Prognosis-A Review.

Rajashri Yarragudi, Alois Gessl, Andreas Vychytil

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rajashri YarragudiClinical Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1580-0070
Alois GesslClinical Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Andreas VychytilClinical Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) is observed in both hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. The prevalence of NODM in dialysis patients is slightly higher compared to subjects of the general population. Based on currently published data there is no convincing evidence that the risk of NODM is different between HD and PD patients. Data on the effect of glucose load on risk of NODM in dialysis patients remain controversial. PD modality (automated or continuous ambulatory PD) has no significant influence on NODM incidence. Chronic inflammation is associated with NODM in dialysis patients. Reported differences in NODM between PD and HD patients are possibly also influenced by differences in demographic factors between these patient groups. Mortality in NODM patients is lower than mortality in patients with preexisting DM. This may be partly explained by the younger age and lower number of comorbidities in patients with NODM.

Indexed as

Age FactorsDiabetes MellitusHumansIncidencePeritoneal DialysisPrevalencePrognosisRenal DialysisRisk FactorsDiabetesGlucose LoadHemodialysisNew-Onset Diabetes MellitusPeritoneal Dialysis

Identifiers

PMID30854792
PMCPMC6916572
OpenAlexW2921344316

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.