Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30865651›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Red cell distribution width associations with clinical outcomes: A population-based cohort study.

Marcello Tonelli, Natasha Wiebe, Matthew T James, Christopher Naugler, Braden J Manns, Scott W Klarenbach, Brenda R Hemmelgarn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Red Cell Distribution Width Is a Risk Factor for Hip Fracture in Elderly Men Without Anemia.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marcello TonelliUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Natasha WiebeUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5613-1582
Matthew T JamesUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Christopher NauglerUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Braden J MannsUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Scott W KlarenbachAlberta Kidney Disease Network, Alberta, Canada.
Brenda R HemmelgarnUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
University of Calgary · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceHigher levels of red cell distribution width (RDW) are associated with adverse outcomes, especially in selected cohorts with or at risk for chronic disease. Whether higher RDW or the related parameter standard deviation of the red blood cell distribution (SD-RBC) can predict a broader range of outcomes in the general population is unknown.

objectiveTo evaluate the association of RDW and SD-RBC with the risk of adverse outcomes in people from the general population.

designPopulation-based retrospective cohort study.

settingHealth care system in a Canadian province (Alberta).

participantsAll 3,156,863 adults living in Alberta, Canada with at least one measure of RDW and SD-RBC between 2003 and 2016. Data were analyzed in September 2018. EXPOSURE: RDW and SD-RBC, classified into percentiles (<1, 1-5, 5-25, 25-75, 75-95, 95-99, >99). MAIN OUTCOMES: All-cause death, first myocardial infarction, first stroke or transient ischemic attack, placement into long-term care (LTC), progression to renal replacement therapy (initiation of chronic dialysis or pre-emptive kidney transplantation), incident solid malignancy, and first hospitalization during follow-up.

resultsOver median follow-up of 6.8 years, 209,991 of 3,156,863 participants (6.7%) died. The risk of death increased with increasing RDW percentile. After adjustment, and compared to RDW in the 25th to 75th percentiles, the risk of death was lower for participants in the <25th percentiles but higher for participants in the 75th-95th percentiles (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.40,1.43), the 95th-99th percentiles (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.83,1.89) and the >99th percentile (HR 2.18, 95% CI 2.12,2.23). Similar results were observed for MI, stroke/TIA, incident cancer, hospitalization and LTC placement, but no association was found between RDW and ESRD. Findings were generally similar for SD-RBC, except that all associations tended to be stronger than for RDW, and both lower and higher values of SD-RBC were independently associated with ESRD. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: RDW and SD-RBC may be useful as prognostic markers for people in the general population, especially for outcomes related to chronic illness. SD-RBC may be superior to RDW.

Indexed as

Erythrocyte IndicesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlbertaCohort StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHumansIschemic Attack, TransientKidney Failure, ChronicLong-Term CareMaleMiddle AgedMortality

Identifiers

PMID30865651
PMCPMC6415845
OpenAlexW2920847475

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.