Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30866680›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of preventive cardiology2019

Age differences in contemporary treatment of patients with chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.

Jesse F Veenis, Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca, Gerard Cm Linssen, Peter R Geerlings, Marco Wf Van Gent, Ismail Aksoy, Liane Oosterom, Arno Hm Moons, Arno W Hoes, Jasper J Brugts and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of preventive cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Jesse F Veenis1 Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca2 Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
Gerard Cm Linssen3 Department of Cardiology, Hospital Group Twente, The Netherlands.
Peter R Geerlings4 Department of Cardiology, St Jans Gasthuis, The Netherlands.
Marco Wf Van Gent5 Department of Cardiology, Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, The Netherlands.
Ismail Aksoy6 Department of Cardiology, Admiraal De Ruyter Ziekenhuis, The Netherlands.
Liane Oosterom7 Department of Cardiology, Waterlandziekenhuis, The Netherlands.
Arno Hm Moons8 Department of Cardiology, MC Slotervaart, The Netherlands.
Arno W Hoes9 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Jasper J Brugts1 Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
CHECK-HF investigators
Erasmus MC · NLAdmiraal De Ruyter Ziekenhuis · NLAlbert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis · NLMaastricht University · NLSlotervaartziekenhuis · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLWaterlandziekenhuis · NLZiekenhuis Groep Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElderly patients are underrepresented in clinical trials but comprise the majority of heart failure patients. Data on age-specific use of heart failure therapy are limited. The European Society of Cardiology heart failure guidelines provide no age-specific treatment recommendations. We investigated practice-based heart failure management in a large registry at heart failure outpatient clinics. DESIGN AND

methodsWe studied 8351 heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients at 34 Dutch outpatient clinics between 2013 and 2016. The mean age was 72.3 ± 11.8 years and we divided age into three categories: less than 60 years (13.9%); 60-74 years (36.0%); and 75 years and over (50.2%).

resultsElderly heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients (≥75 years) received significantly fewer beta-blockers (77.8% vs. 84.2%), renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (75.2% vs. 89.7%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (50.6% vs. 59.6%) and ivabradine (2.9% vs. 9.3%), but significantly more diuretics (88.1% vs. 72.6%) compared to patients aged less than 60 years (

conclusionWith increasing age, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients less often received guideline-recommended medication prescriptions and also in a lower dosage. In addition, a lower percentage of implantable cardioverter defibrillator and cardiac resynchronisation therapy device implantation in elderly patients was observed.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAgedAge FactorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsCardiac Resynchronization TherapyChronic DiseaseDiureticsFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsNetherlandsPractice Patterns, Physicians'RegistriesStroke VolumeAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsDiureticsMineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonistsageguideline adherenceHeart failureHFrEFtreatment

Identifiers

PMID30866680
PMCPMC6696738
OpenAlexW2920829402

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.