Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30870980›Full record

ReviewBiology2019

The Plant Circadian Oscillator.

C Robertson McClung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Role of theHorticulture research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. A Compensated Clock: Temperature and Nutritional Compensation Mechanisms Across Circadian Systems.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  16. Thaumatin-like GeneInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

C Robertson McClungDepartment of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA. c.robertson.mcclung@dartmouth.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7875-3614

Funding

National Science Foundation IOS 1547796 and IOS-1456140Rural Development Administration Next Generation BioGreen 21, grant number SSAC PJ01327306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been nearly 300 years since the first scientific demonstration of a self-sustaining circadian clock in plants. It has become clear that plants are richly rhythmic, and many aspects of plant biology, including photosynthetic light harvesting and carbon assimilation, resistance to abiotic stresses, pathogens, and pests, photoperiodic flower induction, petal movement, and floral fragrance emission, exhibit circadian rhythmicity in one or more plant species. Much experimental effort, primarily, but not exclusively in

Indexed as

alternative splicingcircadian clockcircadian rhythmsplant circadian clockposttranscriptionalposttranslationalprotein stabilitytranscriptional feedback loops

Identifiers

PMID30870980
PMCPMC6466001

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.