Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30870996›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

Increasing Chocolate's Sugar Content Enhances Its Psychoactive Effects and Intake.

Shanon L Casperson, Lisa Lanza, Eram Albajri, Jennifer A Nasser

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03364413 (Behavioral Assessment of the Brain Response to Bioactive Food Components Using Electroretinography), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03364413 completednot on this map

Behavioral Assessment of the Brain Response to Bioactive Food Components Using Electroretinography (Brain's Response to Chocolate)

TypeobservationalSponsorUSDA Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research CenterRan2018 to 2018Enrolled20ConditionsOverweight, ObesityArmsChocolate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. An Attempt to Explain Visual Aesthetic Appreciation.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shanon L CaspersonUSDA, Agricultural Research Service, Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center, 2420 2nd Ave. North, Grand Forks, ND 58203-9034, USA. shanon.casperson@ars.usda.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-6954-9523
Lisa LanzaCollege of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, 1601 Cherry St MS31030 RM 389, Philadelphia, PA 19102-1320, USA. lisa.marcelalanza.lanza@drexel.edu.
Eram AlbajriCollege of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, 1601 Cherry St MS31030 RM 389, Philadelphia, PA 19102-1320, USA. eram.abdullah.albajri@drexel.edu.
Jennifer A NasserCollege of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, 1601 Cherry St MS31030 RM 389, Philadelphia, PA 19102-1320, USA. jan57@drexel.edu.

Funding

Agricultural Research Service 5450-51530-051-00DCollege of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University #
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chocolate elicits unique brain activity compared to other foods, activating similar brain regions and neurobiological substrates with potentially similar psychoactive effects as substances of abuse. We sought to determine the relationship between chocolate with varying combinations of its main constituents (sugar, cocoa, and fat) and its psychoactive effects. Participants consumed 5 g of a commercially available chocolate with increasing amounts of sugar (90% cocoa, 85% cocoa, 70% cocoa, and milk chocolates). After each chocolate sample, participants completed the Psychoactive Effects Questionnaire (PEQ). The PEQ consists of questions taken from the Morphine-Benzedrine Group (MBG), Morphine (M,) and Excitement (E) subscales of the Addiction Research Center Inventory. After all testing procedures, participants completed the Binge Eating Scale (BES) while left alone and allowed to eat as much as they wanted of each of the different chocolates. We found a measurable psychoactive dose⁻effect relationship with each incremental increase in the chocolate's sugar content. The total number of positive responses and the number of positive responses on the E subscale began increasing after tasting the 90% cocoa chocolate, whereas the number of positive responses on the MBG and M subscales began increasing after tasting the 85% cocoa chocolate sample. We did not find a correlation between BES scores and the total amount of chocolate consumed or self-reported scores on the PEQ. These results suggest that each incremental increase in chocolate's sugar content enhances its psychoactive effects. These results extend our understanding of chocolate's appeal and unique ability to prompt an addictive-like eating response.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorAdolescentAdultChocolateFemaleHumansMaleSugarsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultSugarsAddiction Research Center Inventoryaddictive-like eatingchocolatecravingeating behaviorsugar

Identifiers

PMID30870996
PMCPMC6471517

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.