Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2019
Boosting robot-assisted rehabilitation of stroke hemiparesis by individualized selection of upper limb movements - a pilot study.
Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- On the correlation between training modalities and recovery stages in poststroke robotic rehabilitation of the upper limb: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of robotic-assisted upper extremity therapy for stroke patients in different recovery phases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of robotic upper limb treatment after stroke on cognitive patterns: A systematic review.NeuroRehabilitation · 2022Pooled it
- A randomized clinical control study on the efficacy of three-dimensional upper limb robotic exoskeleton training in chronic stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2022Trial
- Comparison of Reachable Workspace Capacity to Real-World Arm Use Performance: A Wearable Accelerometry Study on Chronic Stroke.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and Evaluation of a Novel Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Device Integrating Piano Playing for Enhanced Motor Recovery.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Relearning Upper Limb Proprioception After Stroke Through Robotic Therapy: A Feasibility Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The effects of different types of RAGT on balance function in stroke patients with low levels of independent walking in a convalescent rehabilitation hospital.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Article
- Identifying biomarkers related to motor function in chronic stroke: A fNIRS and TMS study.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Article
- Novel evaluation of upper-limb motor performance after stroke based on normal reaching movement model.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Moving towards precision neurological rehabilitation: a mandatory path to follow in the era of precision neurology.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021Article
- Motor improvement estimation and task adaptation for personalized robot-aided therapy: a feasibility study.Biomedical engineering online · 2020Article
- Enabling precision rehabilitation interventions using wearable sensors and machine learning to track motor recovery.NPJ digital medicine · 2020Article
- JNER at 15 years: analysis of the state of neuroengineering and rehabilitation.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2019Article
- Correction to: Boosting robot-assisted rehabilitation of stroke hemiparesis by individualized selection of upper limb movements - a pilot study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2019Article
- Considerations for at-home upper-limb rehabilitation technology following stroke: Perspectives of stroke survivors and therapists.Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntensive robot-assisted training of the upper limb after stroke can reduce motor impairment, even at the chronic stage. However, the effectiveness of practice for recovery depends on the selection of the practised movements. We hypothesized that rehabilitation can be optimized by selecting the movements to be practiced based on the trainee's performance profile.
methodsWe present a novel principle ('steepest gradients') for performance-based selection of movements. The principle is based on mapping motor performance across a workspace and then selecting movements located at regions of the steepest transition between better and worse performance. To assess the benefit of this principle we compared the effect of 15 sessions of robot-assisted reaching training on upper-limb motor impairment, between two groups of people who have moderate-to-severe chronic upper-limb hemiparesis due to stroke. The test group (N = 7) received steepest gradients-based training, iteratively selected according to the steepest gradients principle with weekly remapping, whereas the control group (N = 9) received a standard "centre-out" reaching training. Training intensity was identical.
resultsBoth groups showed improvement in Fugl-Meyer upper-extremity scores (the primary outcome measure). Moreover, the test group showed significantly greater improvement (twofold) compared to control. The score remained elevated, on average, for at least 4 weeks although the additional benefit of the steepest-gradients -based training diminished relative to control.
conclusionsThis study provides a proof of concept for the superior benefit of performance-based selection of practiced movements in reducing upper-limb motor impairment due to stroke. This added benefit was most evident in the short term, suggesting that performance-based steepest-gradients training may be effective in increasing the rate of initial phase of practice-based recovery; we discuss how long-term retention may also be improved.
trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN65226825 , registered 12 June 2018 - Retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.