ArticleHuman reproduction open2017
Lower endometrial receptivity in HIV-infected women receiving oocyte donation: a comorbidity of HIV infection?
Article in Human reproduction open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionAre the reproductive outcomes of HIV-infected donor oocyte recipient women comparable to those of non-infected women? SUMMARY ANSWER: HIV-infected women have lower clinical pregnancy and live birth rates than non-infected women. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN: The literature on the effect of HIV infection on reproductive outcome is scarce at best; the only report to date comparing oocyte donation cycles in HIV-infected women versus non-infected controls found no differences in pregnancy rates between the two groups. However, this study was performed nearly a decade ago and did not evaluate the effect of immuno-virological characteristics of oocyte recipients or the HIV antiretroviral therapy effect. STUDY DESIGN SIZE AND DURATION: This is a matched-cohort study including 514 oocyte donation cycles, 257 from HIV-infected women and 257 non-infected controls, performed between April 2004 and November 2014. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING AND
methodEach cycle of an HIV-infected woman ( MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Cycles of HIV-infected patients receiving oocyte donation presented lower pregnancy and live birth rates than matched non-infected controls. Treatment options and infection parameters analyzed do not seem to affect the reproductive results in HIV-infected women. The variable most influencing pregnancy outcomes was the number of transferred embryos; lower pregnancy rates were obtained after single embryo transfer. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Patients with HIV infection have specific health issues, such as infection/treatment side effects, which makes it impossible to find a matching control group of non-infected patients for these variables. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsHIV-infected women receiving donated oocytes present lower pregnancy rates when compared to non-infected controls, regardless of the antiretroviral treatment followed. The complexity of the treatments (both in medication types and combinations) makes it difficult to define whether any one treatment option is better than the others in terms of pregnancy outcomes in oocyte recipients. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.