Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30895244›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction open2018

Clinical success of IUI cycles with donor sperm is not affected by total inseminated volume: a RCT.

Jorge Rodriguez-Purata, Laura Latre, Marta Ballester, Clara González-Llagostera, Ignacio Rodríguez, Iñaki Gonzalez-Foruria, Rosario Buxaderas, Francisca Martinez, Pedro N Barri, Buenaventura Coroleu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03006523 (Impact of Inseminated Volume and Live Birth Rates After Intrauterine Insemination), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03006523 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of Inseminated Volume and Live Birth Rates After Intrauterine Insemination (IUI) With Donor Sperm (dIUI): A Prospective Randomized COntrolled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundacion DexeusRan2013 to 2016Enrolled293ConditionsInfertility, Infertility, Male, Same-Sex Marriage, Parent, SingleArmsIntrauterine insemination
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jorge Rodriguez-PurataReproductive Medicine Service, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Gran Via de Carles III, 71-75, Barcelona 08022, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5432-0884
Laura LatreReproductive Medicine Service, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Gran Via de Carles III, 71-75, Barcelona 08022, Spain.
Marta BallesterReproductive Medicine Service, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Gran Via de Carles III, 71-75, Barcelona 08022, Spain.
Clara González-LlagosteraReproductive Medicine Service, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Gran Via de Carles III, 71-75, Barcelona 08022, Spain.
Ignacio RodríguezReproductive Medicine Service, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Gran Via de Carles III, 71-75, Barcelona 08022, Spain.
Iñaki Gonzalez-ForuriaReproductive Medicine Service, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Gran Via de Carles III, 71-75, Barcelona 08022, Spain.
Rosario BuxaderasReproductive Medicine Service, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Gran Via de Carles III, 71-75, Barcelona 08022, Spain.
Francisca MartinezReproductive Medicine Service, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Gran Via de Carles III, 71-75, Barcelona 08022, Spain.
Pedro N BarriReproductive Medicine Service, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Gran Via de Carles III, 71-75, Barcelona 08022, Spain.
Buenaventura CoroleuReproductive Medicine Service, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Gran Via de Carles III, 71-75, Barcelona 08022, Spain.
USP Institut Universitari Dexeus · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionWhat is the impact on live birth rates (LBR) when a donor IUI (dIUI) cycle is performed with an insemination volume of 0.5 mL versus the usual 0.2 mL? SUMMARY ANSWER: LBR after a dIUI cycle is no different when performed with 0.5 versus 0.2 mL. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN: An IUI has an important role in the treatment of severe male infertility, and is often used in same-sex female couples and single parents. Different variables have been studied to determine factors correlated with clinical outcomes (IUI scheduling, ovarian stimulation, sperm parameters) but little is known about the inseminated volume. The use of conical bottom test tubes could contribute substantially to the loss of inseminated spermatozoa because it precludes the total recovery of the sample. Additionally, the insemination catheter could uphold this reduction causing sperm adhesion on the inner walls of the insemination catheter, decreasing even more the total inseminated volume. It is expected that utilizing an IUI approach that increases sperm volume in the fallopian tubes (0.5 mL rather than 0.2 mL) at the time of ovulation will lead to higher LBRs. To avoid bias related to sperm quality, the study population was restricted to dIUI cycles. STUDY DESIGN SIZE AND DURATION: A parallel-group, double-blinded, RCT, including patients undergoing natural or stimulated dIUI, was performed between March 2013 and April 2015. dIUI cycles ( PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING AND

methodThere were 143 cycles (0.2 mL group) and 126 cycles (0.5 mL group). The primary end-point of the trial was LBR per dIUI cycle in both treatment groups. Clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate were evaluated as secondary outcomes. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: No adverse events were reported during the study trial. Study groups (0.2 versus 0.5 mL, respectively) were similar in age (35.8 ± 3.9 versus 35.4 ± 4.0 years: mean±SD), and had similar anti-Mullerian hormone levels (2.2 ± 1.8 versus 2.0 ± 1.5 ng/mL), basal antral follicle count (13.2 ± 6.4 versus 13.6 ± 6.0), BMI (23.5 ± 3.9 versus 23.7 ± 4.1 kg/m LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The study was not powered to detect differences in the secondary outcomes, clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates. The randomization was performed at the dIUI cycle level, therefore, the results are reported as success rate per dIUI cycle rather than per patient. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThis is the first RCT to show that the inseminated volume is not correlated with the probability of a live birth. The miscarriage rate was higher in the 0.2 mL group, although this difference was not statistically significant. If the lower miscarriage rate observed in the 0.5 mL group is confirmed, this could be related to the presence of uterine contractions similar of those generated during sexual intercourse, which may be implicated in the inception of early biochemical embryo-endometrium communication. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: All authors declare having no conflict of interest with regard to this trial. No funding was received for this study. This research was performed under the auspices of 'Càtedra d'Investigació en Obstetrícia I Ginecologia' of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hospital Universitari Quiron-Dexeus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03006523).

Indexed as

donor spermgamete donationinseminated volumenIUIRCTsperm quality

Identifiers

PMID30895244
PMCPMC6276650
OpenAlexW2794161796

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.