Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30899393›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2019

Gut microbiota specific signatures are related to the successful rate of bariatric surgery.

Carolina Gutiérrez-Repiso, Isabel Moreno-Indias, Ana de Hollanda, Gracia María Martín-Núñez, Josep Vidal, Francisco J Tinahones

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Roles of the gut microbiome in weight management.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The implication of gut microbiota in recovery from gastrointestinal surgery.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carolina Gutiérrez-RepisoUnidad de Gestión Clínica de Endocrinología y Nutrición del Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Universidad de Málaga Málaga, Spain.
Isabel Moreno-IndiasUnidad de Gestión Clínica de Endocrinología y Nutrición del Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Universidad de Málaga Málaga, Spain.
Ana de HollandaObesity Unit, Endocrinology and Nutrition Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Gracia María Martín-NúñezUnidad de Gestión Clínica de Endocrinología y Nutrición del Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Universidad de Málaga Málaga, Spain.
Josep VidalObesity Unit, Endocrinology and Nutrition Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Francisco J TinahonesUnidad de Gestión Clínica de Endocrinología y Nutrición del Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Universidad de Málaga Málaga, Spain.
Universidad de Málaga · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bariatric surgery (BS) success rates vary in the long-time. A better understanding of weight-loss response may help improve the outcomes of BS. Gut microbiome could be implicated in the successful rate of BS. The aim of the study is to analyze the role of gut microbiome in the successful rate of BS. This is a cross-sectional study of a prospective cohort of 24 patients who underwent gastric bypass. Patients were classified based on excess weight loss (EWL) as: Success (EWL50% at nadir weight and throughout follow-up), Primary Failure (EWL<50% at nadir weight and thereafter), and Weight Regain (EWL>50% at nadir weight, but <50% at last follow-up visit). Gut microbiome analysis was assessed by High Throughput Sequencing. Cholesterol metabolism was shown as the most affected parameter among groups. Studied groups registered minor changes between their gut microbiome abundances, with

Indexed as

Bariatric surgerybile acidscholesterolgut microbiotaRYGB

Identifiers

PMID30899393
PMCPMC6413284
OpenAlexW2981242223

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.