Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30906903›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in systems biology2018

Integration of large-scale multi-omic datasets: a protein-centric view.

Justin Rendleman, Hyungwon Choi, Christine Vogel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in systems biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Justin RendlemanCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, Department of Biology, New York, USA.
Hyungwon Choi *Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore.
Christine Vogel *Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, Department of Biology, New York, USA.

Funding

Next generation gene expression analysisR35GM127089 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Christine Vogel · 2018 to 2026
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM127089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innovative mass spectrometry-based proteomics has enabled routine measurements of protein abundance, localization, interactions, and modifications, covering unique aspects of gene expression regulation and function. It is now time to move from isolated analyses of these datasets toward true integration of proteomics with other data types to gain insights from the interactions and interdependencies of biomolecules. When combined with genomic or transcriptomic data, proteomics expands genome annotation to identify variant or missing genes. Dynamic proteomic measurements can move analysis from predominantly concentration-based framework to that of synthesis and degradation of proteins. Proteomic data from thousands of cancer patients can foster identification of novel pathogenic mutations via detection of protein sequence changes that lead to dysregulated pathways in various tumors. Such comprehensive efforts can exploit the synergy arising from large and complex datasets to advance virtually every field of biology.

Identifiers

PMID30906903
PMCPMC6426335

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.