ArticlePloS one2019
Genome-wide mining seed-specific candidate genes from peanut for promoter cloning.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-wide identification and characterization ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Article
- Molecular cloning and functional characterization of the promoter of a novelFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Genome-Wide Identification, Characterization, and Expression Analysis of Tubby-like Protein (TLP) Gene Family Members in Woodland Strawberry (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Epigenetic regulation of seed-specific gene expression by DNA methylation valleys in castor bean.BMC biology · 2022Article
- Characterization of sucrose binding protein as a seed-specific promoter in transgenic tobacco Nicotiana tabacum L.PloS one · 2022Article
- Cloning and Functional Characterization of a Pericarp Abundant Expression Promoter (Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of HSP90-RAR1-SGT1-Complex Members FromFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Comprehensive genomic characterization of NAC transcription factor family and their response to salt and drought stress in peanut.BMC plant biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peanut seeds are ideal bioreactors for the production of foreign recombinant proteins and/or nutrient metabolites. Seed-Specific Promoters (SSPs) are important molecular tools for bioreactor research. However, few SSPs have been characterized in peanut seeds. The mining of Seed-Specific Candidate Genes (SSCGs) is a prerequisite for promoter cloning. Here, we described an approach for the genome-wide mining of SSCGs via comparative gene expression between seed and nonseed tissues. Three hundred thirty-seven SSCGs were ultimately identified, and the top 108 SSCGs were characterized. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis revealed that some SSCGs were involved in seed development, allergens, seed storage and fatty acid metabolism. RY REPEAT and GCN4 motifs, which are commonly found in SSPs, were dispersed throughout most of the promoters of SSCGs. Expression pattern analysis revealed that all 108 SSCGs were expressed specifically or preferentially in the seed. These results indicated that the promoters of the 108 SSCGs may perform functions in a seed-specific and/or seed-preferential manner. Moreover, a novel SSP was cloned and characterized from a paralogous gene of SSCG29 from cultivated peanut. Together with the previously characterized SSP of the SSCG5 paralogous gene in cultivated peanut, these results implied that the method for SSCG identification in this study was feasible and accurate. The SSCGs identified in this work could be widely applied to SSP cloning by other researchers. Additionally, this study identified a low-cost, high-throughput approach for exploring tissue-specific genes in other crop species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.