Evidence mapPaperPMID 30923738Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Seeing Your Foot Move Changes Muscle Proprioceptive Feedback.

Rochelle Ackerley, Marie Chancel, Jean-Marc Aimonetti, Edith Ribot-Ciscar, Anne Kavounoudias

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rochelle AckerleyAix-Marseille Université, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire de Neurosciences Sensorielles et Cognitives - UMR 7260, Marseille 13331, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4621-7929
Marie ChancelAix-Marseille Université, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire de Neurosciences Sensorielles et Cognitives - UMR 7260, Marseille 13331, France.
Jean-Marc AimonettiAix-Marseille Université, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire de Neurosciences Sensorielles et Cognitives - UMR 7260, Marseille 13331, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6678-1466
Edith Ribot-CiscarAix-Marseille Université, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire de Neurosciences Sensorielles et Cognitives - UMR 7260, Marseille 13331, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4501-832X
Anne KavounoudiasAix-Marseille Université, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire de Neurosciences Sensorielles et Cognitives - UMR 7260, Marseille 13331, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2712-8739
Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives · FRKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multisensory effects are found when the input from single senses combines, and this has been well researched in the brain. Presently, we examined in humans the potential impact of visuo-proprioceptive interactions at the peripheral level, using microneurography, and compared it with a similar behavioral task. We used a paradigm where participants had either proprioceptive information only (no vision) or combined visual and proprioceptive signals (vision). We moved the foot to measure changes in the sensitivity of single muscle afferents, which can be altered by the descending fusimotor drive. Visual information interacted with proprioceptive information, where we found that for the same passive movement, the response of muscle afferents increased when the proprioceptive channel was the only source of information, as compared with when visual cues were added, regardless of the attentional level. Behaviorally, when participants looked at their foot moving, they more accurately judged differences between movement amplitudes, than in the absence of visual cues. These results impact our understanding of multisensory interactions throughout the nervous system, where the information from different senses can modify the sensitivity of peripheral receptors. This has clinical implications, where future strategies may modulate such visual signals during sensorimotor rehabilitation.

Indexed as

AdultCuesFeedback, SensoryFemaleFootHumansMaleMovementMuscle, SkeletalProprioceptionPsychomotor PerformanceVisual PerceptionYoung Adultfusimotor drivehumankinesthesiamovement perceptionmuscle proprioception

Identifiers

PMID30923738
PMCPMC6437656
OpenAlexW2918844800

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.