ArticleScientific reports2019
A generalized model for combining dependent SNP-level summary statistics and its extensions to statistics of other levels.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A gene based combination test using GWAS summary data.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Pooled it
- cascAGS: Comparative Analysis of SNP Calling Methods for Human Genome Data in the Absence of Gold Standard.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2025Article
- A New Method for Conditional Gene-Based Analysis Effectively Accounts for the Regional Polygenic Background.Genes · 2024Article
- LDAK-GBAT: Fast and powerful gene-based association testing using summary statistics.American journal of human genetics · 2023Article
- sumSTAAR: A flexible framework for gene-based association studies using GWAS summary statistics.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Here I propose a fundamentally new flexible model to reveal the association between a trait and a set of genetic variants in a genomic region/gene. This model was developed for the situation when original individual-level phenotype and genotype data are not available, but the researcher possesses the results of statistical analyses conducted on these data (namely, SNP-level summary Z score statistics and SNP-by-SNP correlations). The new model was analytically derived from the classical multiple linear regression model applied for the region-based association analysis of individual-level phenotype and genotype data by using the linear compression of data, where the SNP-by-SNP correlations are among the explanatory variables, and the summary Z score statistics are categorized as the response variables. I analytically show that the regional association analysis methods developed within the framework of the classical multiple linear regression model with additive effects of genetic variants can be reformulated in terms of the new model without the loss of information. The results obtained from the regional association analysis utilizing the classical model and those derived using the proposed model are identical when SNP-by-SNP correlations and SNP-level statistics are estimated from the same genetic data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.