Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30942413›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine reports2019

Effects of granulocyte colony‑stimulating factor on rabbit carotid and porcine heart models of chronic obliterative arterial disease.

Zhaohui Hu, Zhisong Chen, Yiping Wang, Jinfa Jiang, Gary Tse, Wenjun Xu, Junbo Ge, Bing Sun

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The role of gap junctions in inflammatory and neoplastic disorders (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2017
    Review
  2. Animal models of atherosclerosis.Biomedical reports · 2017
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhaohui HuDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, P.R. China.
Zhisong ChenDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, P.R. China.
Yiping WangDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, P.R. China.
Jinfa JiangDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, P.R. China.
Gary TseDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, P.R. China.
Wenjun XuDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, P.R. China.
Junbo GeShanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.
Bing SunDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, P.R. China.
Tongji University · CNChinese University of Hong Kong · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that granulocyte colony‑stimulating factor (G‑CSF) can promote bone marrow derived progenitor cells to mediate cardiovascular repair, potentially reversing mechanical dysfunction in chronic ischaemic heart disease and post myocardial infarction. Two models were used in the present study both using a surgical ameroid constrictor to induce arterial stenosis. The first model used the carotid artery of rabbits. They were divided into high fat diet (inducing atherosclerosis) or normal fat diet (control) groups. Each was subdivided into surgical exposure group without constrictor, ameroid constrictor receiving normal saline or receiving G‑CSF 15 µg/kg/day. Endothelial markers of endothelial nitric oxide synthase and endothelin 1 were increased by the use of ameroid constrictor in both atherosclerotic and non‑atherosclerotic mice, however were not further altered by G‑CSF. Scanning electron microscopy indicated that ameroid constrictor application altered endothelial morphology from an oval shape to a round shape and this was more prominent in the atherosclerotic compared with the non‑atherosclerotic group. G‑CSF injection increased the number of endothelial cells in all groups. The second model used the left coronary artery of pigs. They were equally divided into following groups, receiving normal saline (control), G‑CSF 2.5 µg/kg/day (low dose), 5 µg/kg/day (medium dose) and 10 µg/kg/day (high dose) for 5 days. G‑CSF at a low or high dose worsened intimal hyperplasia however at a medium dose improved it. In conclusion, G‑CSF had no effect in a rabbit carotid artery model of atherosclerosis. Its effects on the porcine heart were dose‑dependent; arterial disease worsened at a low or high dose, but improved at a medium dose.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarotid ArteriesCoronary VesselsDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugEndothelial CellsEndothelin-1Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHeartMaleMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial IschemiaNitric Oxide Synthase Type IIIRabbitsSwineTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaEndothelin-1Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorNitric Oxide Synthase Type IIITumor Necrosis Factor-alphaVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID30942413
PMCPMC6522810
OpenAlexW2713420674

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.