Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30948276›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2019

Gene-expression profiling of bortezomib added to standard chemoimmunotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (REMoDL-B): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

Andrew Davies, Thomas E Cummin, Sharon Barrans, Tom Maishman, Christoph Mamot, Urban Novak, Josh Caddy, Louise Stanton, Shamim Kazmi-Stokes, Andrew McMillan and 14 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIEquivalence TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 147 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
147citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
22.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

147 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 261 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SEOM-GOTEL clinical guidelines on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (update 2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Review

87 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew DaviesCancer Research UK Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Thomas E CumminCancer Research UK Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Sharon BarransHaematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK.
Tom MaishmanSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Christoph MamotMedical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Switzerland.
Urban NovakDepartment of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Josh CaddySouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Louise StantonSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Shamim Kazmi-StokesCentre for Drug Development, Cancer Research UK, London, UK.
Andrew McMillanDepartment of Haematology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Paul FieldsDepartment of Haematology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, Kings Health Partners, London, UK.
Christopher PocockDepartment of Haematology, East Kent Hospitals University Foundation Trust, Canterbury, UK.
Graham P CollinsOxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Richard StephensNational Cancer Research Institute Consumer Forum, London, UK.
Francesco CuccoDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Alexandra ClipsonDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Chulin ShaSchool of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Reuben ToozeHaematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK; Section of Experimental Haematology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Matthew A CareSection of Experimental Haematology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Gareth GriffithsSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Ming-Qing DuDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
David R WestheadSchool of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Catherine BurtonHaematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK.
Peter W M JohnsonCancer Research UK Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. Electronic address: johnsonp@soton.ac.uk.
University of Southampton · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBCancer Research UK · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBChurchill Hospital · GBEast Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust · GBKantonsspital Aarau · CHNational Cancer Research Institute · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

Cancer Research UK 10066Cancer Research UK 12128Cancer Research UK 25352Medical Research Council MR/L01629X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiologically distinct subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma can be identified using gene-expression analysis to determine their cell of origin, corresponding to germinal centre or activated B cell. We aimed to investigate whether adding bortezomib to standard therapy could improve outcomes in patients with these subtypes.

methodsIn a randomised evaluation of molecular guided therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with bortezomib (REMoDL-B), an open-label, adaptive, randomised controlled, phase 3 superiority trial, participants were recruited from 107 cancer centres in the UK (n=94) and Switzerland (n=13). Eligible patients had previously untreated, histologically confirmed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with sufficient diagnostic material from initial biopsies for gene-expression profiling and pathology review; were aged 18 years or older; had ECOG performance status of 2 or less; had bulky stage I or stage II-IV disease requiring full-course chemotherapy; had measurable disease; and had cardiac, lung, renal, and liver function sufficient to tolerate chemotherapy. Patients initially received one 21-day cycle of standard rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP; rituximab 375 mg/m

findingsBetween June 2, 2011, and June 10, 2015, 1128 eligible patients were registered, of whom 918 (81%) were randomly assigned to receive treatment (n=459 to R-CHOP, n=459 to RB-CHOP), comprising 244 (26·6%) with activated B-cell disease, 475 (51·7%) with germinal centre B cell disease, and 199 (21·7%) with unclassified disease. At a median follow-up of 29·7 months (95% CI 29·0-32·0), we saw no evidence for a difference in progression-free survival in the combined germinal centre and activated B-cell population between R-CHOP and RB-CHOP (30-month progression-free survival 70·1%, 95% CI 65·0-74·7 vs 74·3%, 69·3-78·7; hazard ratio 0·86, 95% CI 0·65-1·13; p=0·28). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse event was haematological toxicity, reported in 178 (39·8%) of 447 patients given R-CHOP and 187 (42·1%) of 444 given RB-CHOP. However, RB-CHOP was not associated with increased haematological toxicity and 398 [87·1%] of 459 participants assigned to receive RB-CHOP completed six cycles of treatment. Grade 3 or worse neuropathy occurred in 17 (3·8%) patients given RB-CHOP versus eight (1·8%) given R-CHOP. Serious adverse events occurred in 190 (42·5%) patients given R-CHOP, including five treatment-related deaths, and 223 (50·2%) given RB-CHOP, including four treatment-related deaths.

interpretationThis is the first large-scale study in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma to use real-time molecular characterisation for prospective stratification, randomisation, and subsequent analysis of biologically distinct subgroups of patients. The addition of bortezomib did not improve progression-free survival.

fundingJanssen-Cilag, Bloodwise, and Cancer Research UK.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingTranscriptomeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorBortezomibCyclophosphamideDisease ProgressionDoxorubicinFemaleHumansLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorBortezomibCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinPrednisoneProteasome InhibitorsR-CHOP protocolRituximabVincristine

Identifiers

PMID30948276
PMCPMC6494978
OpenAlexW2928384177

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.