ArticleBMC systems biology2019
A fast and efficient count-based matrix factorization method for detecting cell types from single-cell RNAseq data.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Consensus scHPF Identifies Cell Type-Specific Drug Responses in Glioma by Integrating Large-Scale scRNA-seq.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- GoM DE: interpreting structure in sequence count data with differential expression analysis allowing for grades of membership.Genome biology · 2023Article
- GoM DE: interpreting structure in sequence count data with differential expression analysis allowing for grades of membership.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Biologically informed deep learning to query gene programs in single-cell atlases.Nature cell biology · 2023Article
- Post-ischemic inflammatory response in the brain: Targeting immune cell in ischemic stroke therapy.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2023Review
- Separating measurement and expression models clarifies confusion in single-cell RNA sequencing analysis.Nature genetics · 2021Review
- Mutational signature learning with supervised negative binomial non-negative matrix factorization.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- netNMF-sc: leveraging gene-gene interactions for imputation and dimensionality reduction in single-cell expression analysis.Genome research · 2020Article
- Algorithmic approaches to clonal reconstruction in heterogeneous cell populations.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2019Article
- An Efficient and Flexible Method for Deconvoluting Bulk RNA-Seq Data with Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data.Cells · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSingle-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) data always involves various unwanted variables, which would be able to mask the true signal to identify cell-types. More efficient way of dealing with this issue is to extract low dimension information from high dimensional gene expression data to represent cell-type structure. In the past two years, several powerful matrix factorization tools were developed for scRNAseq data, such as NMF, ZIFA, pCMF and ZINB-WaVE. But the existing approaches either are unable to directly model the raw count of scRNAseq data or are really time-consuming when handling a large number of cells (e.g. n>500).
resultsIn this paper, we developed a fast and efficient count-based matrix factorization method (single-cell negative binomial matrix factorization, scNBMF) based on the TensorFlow framework to infer the low dimensional structure of cell types. To make our method scalable, we conducted a series of experiments on three public scRNAseq data sets, brain, embryonic stem, and pancreatic islet. The experimental results show that scNBMF is more powerful to detect cell types and 10 - 100 folds faster than the scRNAseq bespoke tools.
conclusionsIn this paper, we proposed a fast and efficient count-based matrix factorization method, scNBMF, which is more powerful for detecting cell type purposes. A series of experiments were performed on three public scRNAseq data sets. The results show that scNBMF is a more powerful tool in large-scale scRNAseq data analysis. scNBMF was implemented in R and Python, and the source code are freely available at https://github.com/sqsun .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.