Evidence mapPaperPMID 30954082Full record

SynthesisLipids in health and disease2019

Impact of ursodeoxycholic acid on circulating lipid concentrations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.

Luis E Simental-Mendía, Mario Simental-Mendía, Adriana Sánchez-García, Maciej Banach, Maria-Corina Serban, Arrigo F G Cicero, Amirhossein Sahebkar

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lipids in health and disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The treatment of primary biliary cholangitis: from shadow to light.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  15. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Luis E Simental-MendíaUnidad de Investigación Biomédica, Delegación Durango, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico, Mexico.
Mario Simental-MendíaDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Universitario "Dr. José E. González", Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, NL, Mexico.
Adriana Sánchez-GarcíaEndocrinology Division, Hospital Universitario "Dr. José E. González", Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, NL, Mexico.
Maciej BanachDepartment of Hypertension, WAM University Hospital in Lodz, Medical University of Lodz, Zeromskiego 113, Lodz, Poland.
Maria-Corina SerbanDepartment of Functional Sciences, Discipline of Pathophysiology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania.
Arrigo F G CiceroMedical and Surgical Sciences Department, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Amirhossein SahebkarNeurogenic Inflammation Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. amir_saheb2000@yahoo.com.
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León · MXMashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRMedical University of Lodz · PLMexican Social Security Institute · MXUniversity of Bologna · ITVictor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials was to examine whether ursodeoxycholic acid treatment is an effective lipid-lowering agent.

methodsPubMed-Medline, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases were searched in order to find randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on lipid profile. A random-effect model and the generic inverse variance weighting method were used for quantitative data synthesis. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using the leave-one-out method. A random-effects meta-regression model was performed to explore the association between potential confounders and the estimated effect size on plasma lipid concentrations.

resultsMeta-analysis of 20 treatment arms revealed a significant reduction of total cholesterol following ursodeoxycholic acid treatment (WMD: - 13.85 mg/dL, 95% CI: -21.45, - 6.25, p < 0.001). Nonetheless, LDL-C (WMD: -6.66 mg/dL, 95% CI: -13.99, 0.67, p = 0.075), triglycerides (WMD: - 1.42 mg/dL, 95% CI: -7.51, 4.67, p = 0.648) and HDL-C (WMD: -0.18 mg/dL, 95% CI: -5.23, 4.87, p = 0.944) were not found to be significantly altered by ursodeoxycholic acid administration. In the subgroup of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, ursodeoxycholic acid reduced total cholesterol (WMD: - 29.86 mg/dL, 95% CI: -47.39, - 12.33, p = 0.001) and LDL-C (WMD: -37.27 mg/dL, 95% CI: -54.16, - 20.38, p < 0.001) concentrations without affecting TG and HDL-C.

conclusionThis meta-analysis suggests that ursodeoxycholic acid therapy might be associated with significant total cholesterol lowering particularly in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

Indexed as

Cholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLHumansHypolipidemic AgentsLipid MetabolismLipidsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTriglyceridesUrsodeoxycholic AcidCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLHypolipidemic AgentsLipidsTriglyceridesUrsodeoxycholic AcidHDLLDLLipid profileMeta-analysisTotal cholesterolTriglyceridesUrsodeoxycholic acid

Identifiers

PMID30954082
PMCPMC6451779
OpenAlexW2943036267

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.