ReviewPolymers2018
Polysaccharide Based Scaffolds for Soft Tissue Engineering Applications.
Review in Polymers, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 179 citations in OpenAlex.
- The non-scaffold effects of natural polysaccharides in promoting organ regeneration: a review.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- The Unfulfilled Potential of Synthetic and Biological Hydrogel Membranes in the Treatment of Abdominal Hernias.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Extraction and In Vitro Skincare Effect Assessment of Polysaccharides Extract from the Roots ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Evolution of Technology-Driven In Vitro Models for Neurodegenerative Diseases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Biomimetic Scaffolds-A Novel Approach to Three Dimensional Cell Culture Techniques for Potential Implementation in Tissue Engineering.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Biomolecules-Loading of 3D-Printed Alginate-Based Scaffolds for Cartilage Tissue Engineering Applications: A Review on Current Status and Future Prospective.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2024Review
- Polysaccharide-based biomaterials in a journey from 3D to 4D printing.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Review
- Structures, Properties, and Bioengineering Applications of Alginates and Hyaluronic Acid.Polymers · 2023Review
- Scaffold Using Chitosan, Agarose, Cellulose, Dextran and Protein for Tissue Engineering-A Review.Polymers · 2023Review
- Macro, Micro, and Nano-Inspired Bioactive Polymeric Biomaterials in Therapeutic, and Regenerative Orofacial Applications.Drug design, development and therapy · 2023Review
- Recent advances in tendon tissue engineering strategy.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Amphiphilic Block Copolymers: Their Structures, and Self-Assembly to Polymeric Micelles and Polymersomes as Drug Delivery Vehicles.Polymers · 2022Review
- Application of Nano-Inspired Scaffolds-Based Biopolymer Hydrogel for Bone and Periodontal Tissue Regeneration.Polymers · 2022Review
- Genipin-Crosslinked, Proteosaccharide Scaffolds for Potential Neural Tissue Engineering Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Advancements in the Use of Hydrogels for Regenerative Medicine: Properties and Biomedical Applications.International journal of biomaterials · 2022Review
- Adipose tissue derived stromal cells in a gelatin-based 3D matrix with exclusive ascorbic acid signalling emerged as a novel neural tissue engineering construct: an innovative prototype for soft tissue.Regenerative biomaterials · 2022Article
- Article
- Recent Advancements in 3D Printing of Polysaccharide Hydrogels in Cartilage Tissue Engineering.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Alginate-International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Soft tissue reconstructs require materials that form three-dimensional (3-D) structures supportive to cell proliferation and regenerative processes. Polysaccharides, due to their hydrophilicity, biocompatibility, biodegradability, abundance, and presence of derivatizable functional groups, are distinctive scaffold materials. Superior mechanical properties, physiological signaling, and tunable tissue response have been achieved through chemical modification of polysaccharides. Moreover, an appropriate formulation strategy enables spatial placement of the scaffold to a targeted site. With the advent of newer technologies, these preparations can be tailor-made for responding to alterations in temperature, pH, or other physiological stimuli. In this review, we discuss the developmental and biological aspects of scaffolds prepared from four polysaccharides, viz. alginic acid (ALG), chitosan (CHI), hyaluronic acid (HA), and dextran (DEX). Clinical studies on these scaffolds are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.