Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30963239›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2019

Acute cardiopulmonary responses to strength training, high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training.

Roberto Falz, Sven Fikenzer, Roman Holzer, Ulrich Laufs, Kati Fikenzer, Martin Busse

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Aerobic high-intensity intervals are superior to improve V̇OScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2023
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Characterizing the Heart Rate Response to the 4 × 4 Interval Exercise Protocol.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  14. How to Exercise During Coronavirus Quarantine?Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Roberto FalzInstitute of Sport Medicine and Prevention, University of Leipzig, Marschnerstraße 29a, 04109, Leipzig, Germany. roberto.falz@uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9956-7538
Sven FikenzerMedical Department IV-Cardiology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Roman HolzerInstitute of Sport Medicine and Prevention, University of Leipzig, Marschnerstraße 29a, 04109, Leipzig, Germany.
Ulrich LaufsMedical Department IV-Cardiology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Kati FikenzerMedical Department IV-Cardiology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Martin BusseInstitute of Sport Medicine and Prevention, University of Leipzig, Marschnerstraße 29a, 04109, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLong-term effects of exercise training are well studied. Acute hemodynamic responses to various training modalities, in particularly strength training (ST), have only been described in a few studies. This study examines the acute responses to ST, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MCT).

methodsTwelve young male subjects (age 23.4 ± 2.6 years; BMI 23.7 ± 1.5 kg/m

resultsSimilar peak blood lactate responses were observed after HIIT and ST (8.5 ± 2.6 and 8.1 ± 1.2 mmol/l, respectively; p = 0.83). The training impact time was 90.7 ± 8.5% for HIIT and 68.2 ± 8.5% for MCT (p < 0.0001). The mean cardiac output was significantly higher for HIIT compared to that of MCT and ST (23.2 ± 4.1 vs. 20.9 ± 2.9 vs. 12.9 ± 2.9 l/min, respectively; p < 0.0001). VO

conclusionsDespite an equal training duration and a similar acute metabolic response, large differences with regard to the training impact time and the cardiopulmonary response give evident. HIIT and MCT, but less ST, induced a sufficient cardiopulmonary response, which is important for the preventive effects of training; however, large differences in intensity were apparent for ST.

Indexed as

Cardiorespiratory FitnessHemodynamicsOxygen ConsumptionAdultBody Mass IndexHumansMalePhysical Conditioning, HumanAcute physiological responseCardiorespiratoryExerciseHemodynamicsStroke volume

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.