Trial reportJournal of affective disorders2019
Use of machine learning in predicting clinical response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder and major depression: A resting state electroencephalography study.
Trial report in Journal of affective disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning in the prediction of treatment response for emotional disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical psychology review · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning algorithms for predicting PTSD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning approaches in the therapeutic outcome prediction in major depressive disorder: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Predicting treatment response using EEG in major depressive disorder: A machine-learning meta-analysis.Translational psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2021Pooled it
- Interaction of artificial intelligence, mental disorders, and diverse data modalities: Potential treatment management based on the "method-disease-data" axis.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Novel TMS-derived metrics enable machine learning classification of major depressive disorder.NPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience · 2026Article
- Plasma copeptin is coupled to resting-state frontoinsular-subgenual alpha dynamics in major depression with comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Generalized Anxiety Disorder.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025Review
- Nomogram Based on HRV for Predicting the Therapeutic Effects of Orthostatic Training in Children with Vasovagal Syncope.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Engineering and Technological Advancements in Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS): A Five-Year Review.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- How to Solve Clinical Challenges in Mood Disorders; Machine Learning Approaches Using Electrophysiological Markers.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Review
- Novel Approaches for the Treatment of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Interventions and Insights from Clinical Trials.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Elevating the field for applying neuroimaging to individual patients in psychiatry.Translational psychiatry · 2024Review
- Pre-treatment frontal beta events are associated with executive dysfunction improvement after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression: A preliminary report.Journal of psychiatric research · 2023Article
- Modeling the antidepressant treatment response to transcranial magnetic stimulation using an exponential decay function.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Deep learning and machine learning in psychiatry: a survey of current progress in depression detection, diagnosis and treatment.Brain informatics · 2023Review
- Fronto-central resting-state 15-29 Hz transient beta events change with therapeutic transcranial magnetic stimulation for posttraumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Methodological and Quality Flaws in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Research: Systematic Review.JMIR mental health · 2023Review
- Burning down the house: reinventing drug discovery in psychiatry for the development of targeted therapies.Molecular psychiatry · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is clinically effective for major depressive disorder (MDD) and investigational for other conditions including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Understanding the mechanisms of TMS action and developing biomarkers predicting response remain important goals. We applied a combination of machine learning and electroencephalography (EEG), testing whether machine learning analysis of EEG coherence would (1) predict clinical outcomes in individuals with comorbid MDD and PTSD, and (2) determine whether an individual had received a TMS course.
methodsWe collected resting-state 8-channel EEG before and after TMS (5 Hz to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex). We used Lasso regression and Support Vector Machine (SVM) to test the hypothesis that baseline EEG coherence predicted the outcome and to assess if EEG coherence changed after TMS.
resultsIn our sample, clinical response to TMS were predictable based on pretreatment EEG coherence (n = 29). After treatment, 13/29 had more than 50% reduction in MDD self-report score 12/29 had more than 50% reduction in PTSD self-report score. For MDD, area under roc curve was for MDD was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.69-0.94) and for PTSD was 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.54-0.87). SVM classifier was able to accurately assign EEG recordings to pre- and post-TMS treatment. The accuracy for Alpha, Beta, Theta and Delta bands was 75.4 ± 1.5%, 77.4 ± 1.4%, 73.8 ± 1.5%, and 78.6 ± 1.4%, respectively, all significantly better than chance (50%, p < 0.001). LIMITATION: Limitations of this work include lack of sham condition, modest sample size, and a sparse electrode array. Despite these methodological limitations, we found validated and clinically meaningful results.
conclusionsMachine learning successfully predicted non-response to TMS with high specificity, and identified pre- and post-TMS status using EEG coherence. This approach may provide mechanistic insights and may also become a clinically useful screening tool for TMS candidates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.