Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30978624›Full record

Trial reportJournal of affective disorders2019

Use of machine learning in predicting clinical response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder and major depression: A resting state electroencephalography study.

Amin Zandvakili, Noah S Philip, Stephanie R Jones, Audrey R Tyrka, Benjamin D Greenberg, Linda L Carpenter

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of affective disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. How to Solve Clinical Challenges in Mood Disorders; Machine Learning Approaches Using Electrophysiological Markers.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amin ZandvakiliButler Hospital, Providence, RI 02906, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02906, United States; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI 02908, United States. Electronic address: amin_zandvakili@brown.edu.
Noah S PhilipButler Hospital, Providence, RI 02906, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02906, United States; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI 02908, United States.
Stephanie R JonesCenter for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI 02908, United States; Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI 02906, United States.
Audrey R TyrkaButler Hospital, Providence, RI 02906, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02906, United States.
Benjamin D GreenbergButler Hospital, Providence, RI 02906, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02906, United States; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI 02908, United States.
Linda L CarpenterButler Hospital, Providence, RI 02906, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02906, United States.
Providence College · USBrown University · US

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115677 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI SCHMID, CHRISTOPHER H. · 2016 to 2025
$45.0M
The neural basis of sequential control in human and non-human primatesP20GM103645 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI SHERIF, MOHAMED · 2013 to 2022
$22.9M
Promoting Research Training During Psychiatry ResidencyR25MH101076 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI AUDREY TYRKA · 2013 to 2026
$2.8M
PTSD and the Default Network: Developing Imaging PhenotypesIK2CX000724 · VA · PROVIDENCE VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI PHILIP, NOAH STEPHEN · 2013 to 2017
–
CSRD VA IK2 CX000724NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103645NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115677NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH101076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is clinically effective for major depressive disorder (MDD) and investigational for other conditions including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Understanding the mechanisms of TMS action and developing biomarkers predicting response remain important goals. We applied a combination of machine learning and electroencephalography (EEG), testing whether machine learning analysis of EEG coherence would (1) predict clinical outcomes in individuals with comorbid MDD and PTSD, and (2) determine whether an individual had received a TMS course.

methodsWe collected resting-state 8-channel EEG before and after TMS (5 Hz to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex). We used Lasso regression and Support Vector Machine (SVM) to test the hypothesis that baseline EEG coherence predicted the outcome and to assess if EEG coherence changed after TMS.

resultsIn our sample, clinical response to TMS were predictable based on pretreatment EEG coherence (n = 29). After treatment, 13/29 had more than 50% reduction in MDD self-report score 12/29 had more than 50% reduction in PTSD self-report score. For MDD, area under roc curve was for MDD was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.69-0.94) and for PTSD was 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.54-0.87). SVM classifier was able to accurately assign EEG recordings to pre- and post-TMS treatment. The accuracy for Alpha, Beta, Theta and Delta bands was 75.4 ± 1.5%, 77.4 ± 1.4%, 73.8 ± 1.5%, and 78.6 ± 1.4%, respectively, all significantly better than chance (50%, p < 0.001). LIMITATION: Limitations of this work include lack of sham condition, modest sample size, and a sparse electrode array. Despite these methodological limitations, we found validated and clinically meaningful results.

conclusionsMachine learning successfully predicted non-response to TMS with high specificity, and identified pre- and post-TMS status using EEG coherence. This approach may provide mechanistic insights and may also become a clinically useful screening tool for TMS candidates.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPredictive Value of TestsSupport Vector MachineTranscranial Magnetic StimulationComorbidityElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedPrefrontal CortexRhode IslandSelf ReportSensitivity and SpecificityStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticFunctional connectivityMachine learningMajor depressive disorderPosttraumatic stress disorderResting state EEGTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID30978624
PMCPMC6520189
OpenAlexW2930429888

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.