Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30994467›Full record

SynthesisJMIR mHealth and uHealth2019

Application of Mobile Health Technologies Aimed at Salt Reduction: Systematic Review.

Shahmir H Ali, Rong Luo, Yuan Li, Xiangjun Liu, Chengyao Tang, Puhong Zhang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sodium Intake and Related Diseases 2.0.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Dietitians Australia position statement on telehealth.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shahmir H Ali *Krieger School of Arts and Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0360-3507
Rong Luo *The George Institute for Global Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2725-9939
Yuan LiThe George Institute for Global Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1887-7065
Xiangjun LiuSchool of Health Humanities, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1674-1287
Chengyao TangPublic Health Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6508-3693
Puhong ZhangThe George Institute for Global Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4610-9848

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh salt consumption has contributed to the rise of noncommunicable diseases around the world. The application of mobile health (mHealth) technologies has witnessed rapid growth in recent years. However, evidence to support mHealth interventions to confront the challenge of salt reduction has not yet been critically reviewed.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to identify, characterize, and evaluate mHealth interventions aimed at salt reduction across the world.

methodsA systematic search of studies in English or Chinese language published from January 1, 1992 to July 31, 2017 was conducted using 4 English databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Global Health, and Cochrane) and 3 Chinese databases (Wanfang, China Science and Technology Journal, and China National Knowledge of Infrastructure). All studies directly using mobile technologies in health care with a primary or secondary objective of reducing dietary salt consumption were included.

resultsA total of 1609 articles were found using the search strategy, with 11 full articles (8 English and 3 Chinese) being included for data extraction, including 11 interventional studies. Overall, few high-quality interventions were identified. Most interventions were limited by small study population sample sizes, lack of control groups, and short follow-up times, all of which were obstacles in generating long-term scalable approaches. Most interventions employed short message service as a platform for mHealth interventions, whereas some innovative mHealth technologies were also explored. Most interventions had a primary focus of improving awareness of dietary salt consumption. The outcome variables used to measure intervention effectiveness included 24-hour urinary sodium excretion, spot urine sampling, dietary records, and indirect behavior or knowledge indicators targeting salt consumption. Although most interventions displayed positive outcome results, none of them provided reliable evidence to evaluate the effectiveness of salt reduction.

conclusionsSalt reduction in mHealth initiatives remains relatively unexplored; however, studies that did intervene on salt-reduction show the potential of mHealth as an effective intervention method. We provide 3 recommendations for future mHealth interventions in salt reduction-(1) increased use of new, innovative, and interactive mHealth technologies; (2) development of mHealth interventions with primary prevention measures and goals of salt reduction; and (3) large-scale, rigorously designed, and object-targeted clinical trials of mHealth interventions with appropriate quantitative outcome variables, in particular 24-hour urine sodium.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorHarm ReductionHumansMobile ApplicationsSodium Chloride, DietarySodium Chloride, Dietarycardiovascular diseasesdietmobile healthsodiumsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30994467
PMCPMC6492062

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.