SynthesisStem cell research & therapy2019
Effect of stem cell transplantation on patients with ischemic heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Stem cell research & therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative effectiveness of mesenchymal stem cell versus bone-marrow mononuclear cell transplantation in heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Pooled it
- Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes Therapy for Ischemic Heart Disease in Animal Model: A Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Therapeutic efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a meta-analysis of preclinical studies.Stem cell research & therapy · 2022Pooled it
- Induced pluripotent stem cell therapies in heart failure treatment: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Regenerative medicinePooled it
- Can cell-based therapies bridge the gap between research and reality in the treatment of myocarditis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Regenerative therapy · 2026Review
- Current status and new horizons in stem cell therapy in cardiovascular regenerative medicine (CaVaReM): an update.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Bone marrow stem cell therapy in heart failure patients with low ejection fraction: a systematic review.American journal of stem cells · 2025Review
- Deciphering Oxidative Stress in Cardiovascular Disease Progression: A Blueprint for Mechanistic Understanding and Therapeutic Innovation.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A Single Injection of ADRCs Does Not Prevent AAA Formation in Rats in a Randomized Blinded Design.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Follow-up of intramyocardial bone marrow mononuclear cell transplantation beyond 10 years.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Cell sheet transplantation for ischemic heart disease: a systematic review.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2023Article
- Stem Cell-Based Therapy and Cell-Free Therapy as an Alternative Approach for Cardiac Regeneration.Stem cells international · 2023Review
- Contemporary Challenges of Regenerative Therapy in Patients with Ischemic and Non-Ischemic Heart Failure.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Review
- Cardiomyocyte Death and Genome-Edited Stem Cell Therapy for Ischemic Heart Disease.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2021Review
- Identification of Angiogenic Cargo in Extracellular Vesicles Secreted from Human Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells and Induction of Angiogenesis In Vitro and In Vivo.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Unlocking mammalian regeneration through hypoxia inducible factor one alpha signaling.Biomaterials · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stem cell transplantation (SCT) has become a promising way to treat ischemic heart failure (IHF). We performed a large-scale meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to investigate the efficacy and safety of SCT in IHF patients. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving stem cell transplantation for the treatment of IHF were identified by searching the PubMed, EMBASE, SpringerLink, Web of Science, and Cochrane Systematic Review databases as well as from reviews and the reference lists of relevant articles. Fourteen eligible randomized controlled trials were included in this study, for a total of 669 IHF patients, of which 380 patients were treated with SCT. The weighted mean difference (WMD) was calculated for changes in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (LVEDV and LVESV), and Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina grade using a fixed effects model, while relative risk (RR) was used for mortality. Compared with the control group, SCT significantly lowered the NYHA class (MD = - 0.73, 95% CI - 1.32 to - 0.14, P < 0.05), LVESV (MD = - 14.80, 95% CI - 20.88 to - 8.73, P < 0.05), and CCS grade (MD = - 0.81, 95% CI - 1.45 to - 0.17, P < 0.05). Additionally, SCT increased LVEF (MD = 6.55, 95% CI 5.93 to 7.16, P < 0.05). However, LVEDV (MD = - 0.33, 95% CI - 1.09 to 0.44, P > 0.05) and mortality (RR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.66, P > 0.05) did not differ between the two groups. This meta-analysis suggests that SCT may contribute to the improvement of LVEF, as well as the reduction of the NYHA class, CCS grade, and LVESV. In addition, SCT does not affect mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.