ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2019
Surfaces that Adhesively Discriminate Breast Epithelial Cell Lines and Lymphocytes in Buffer and Human Breast Milk.
Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accessing the DNA in Breast Tissue: Adhesive Cell Capture from Flow onto Fibers of Cellulose Papers.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Contact Area and Deformation ofLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We report new surface coatings that adhesively distinguish three breast epithelial cell lines (MCF-10A, MCF-7, and TMX2-28) when cell suspensions in buffer or breast milk are flowed over the coatings. We also report the selective capture of epithelial cells and rejection of Jurkat lymphocytes, with average selectivities exceeding 60 and captured cell purities often exceeding >99%. The surfaces achieve the dual goals of selective cell capture and resistance to fouling by proteins and other components of breast milk. The coatings do not rely on antibody targeting of cell surface markers but instead contain polycation chains embedded within a layer of end-tethered poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) chains. The PEG, somewhat shielding the polycations, prevents surface fouling by proteins, nondesired cells, and other milk components, while the polycations produce electrostatic attractions that are heterogeneous on nanoscopic length scales. These electrostatic heterogeneities on the engineered coating, shown to produce curvature-selective particle capture in other studies, produce cell selectivity here. The ability of the engineered surfaces to discriminate these cell lines via an electrostatic driving force is remarkable, as the cells are of very similar surface charge as evidenced by their nearly identical ζ-potentials. The current surfaces, which likely distinguish cells based on their electrostatic surface landscape combined with other factors, adhesively distinguish cell lines that may differ only slightly in their expression of a surface marker, or cancer cells that minimally express EpCAM but which have different distributions of electrostatic charge on their surfaces. These surfaces are among the first to be documented for the compatibility of a polymer brush with human breast milk and may find use in technologies that capture cells from human breast milk or other complex fluids for cancer risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.