Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31035599›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2019

Molecular Biomarkers in Fragile X Syndrome.

Marwa Zafarullah, Flora Tassone

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06957054 (Assessment of Neural Biomarkers in Adult Subjects With Fragile X Syndrome and Typically Developing Subjects), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06957054 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Neural Biomarkers in Adult Subjects With Fragile X Syndrome and Typically Developing Subjects

TypeobservationalSponsorConnecta Therapeutics, S.L.Ran2024 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsFragile X Syndrome (FXS), Neurotypical AdultsArmsAny
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. State-of-the-art therapies for fragile X syndrome.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antisense oligonucleotide rescue of CGG expansion-dependentProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Fragile X Syndrome: From Molecular Aspect to Clinical Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marwa ZafarullahDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of California Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, 95817 CA, USA. mzafarullah@ucdavis.edu.
Flora TassoneDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of California Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, 95817 CA, USA. ftassone@ucdavis.edu.
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of California Davis Medical Center · US

Funding

Epigenetic regulation of the FMR1 geneR01GM113929 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CHEDIN, FREDERIC LOUIS, HAGERMAN, PAUL J · 2015 to 2018
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM113929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common inherited form of intellectual disability (ID) and a known monogenic cause of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). It is a trinucleotide repeat disorder, in which more than 200 CGG repeats in the 5' untranslated region (UTR) of the fragile X mental retardation 1 (

Indexed as

ASD.FMR1Fmr1 KO mouseFMRPfragile X syndromeintellectual disabilitymolecular biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID31035599
PMCPMC6562871
OpenAlexW2941637675

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.