Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31038811›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2019

Phenotypic sexual dimorphism is associated with genomic signatures of resolved sexual conflict.

Alison E Wright, Thea F Rogers, Matteo Fumagalli, Christopher R Cooney, Judith E Mank

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Expression Divergence in Response to Sex-biased Selection.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sex-biased gene expression and recent sex chromosome turnover.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Disagreement in FMolecular ecology resources · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Sexual Dimorphism in the Age of Genomics: How, When, Where.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Alison E WrightDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Thea F RogersDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Matteo FumagalliDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Christopher R CooneyDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Judith E MankDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK.
University of Sheffield · GBImperial College London · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intralocus sexual conflict, where an allele benefits one sex at the expense of the other, has an important role in shaping genetic diversity of populations through balancing selection. However, the potential for mating systems to exert balancing selection through sexual conflict on the genome remains unclear. Furthermore, the nature and potential for resolution of sexual conflict across the genome has been hotly debated. To address this, we analysed de novo transcriptomes from six avian species, chosen to reflect the full range of sexual dimorphism and mating systems. Our analyses combine expression and population genomic statistics across reproductive and somatic tissue, with measures of sperm competition and promiscuity. Our results reveal that balancing selection is weakest in the gonad, consistent with the resolution of sexual conflict and evolutionary theory that phenotypic sex differences are associated with lower levels of ongoing conflict. We also demonstrate a clear link between variation in sexual conflict and levels of genetic variation across phylogenetic space in a comparative framework. Our observations suggest that this conflict is short-lived, and is resolved via the decoupling of male and female gene expression patterns, with important implications for the role of sexual selection in adaptive potential and role of dimorphism in facilitating sex-specific fitness optima.

Indexed as

GenomeSex CharacteristicsAnimalsBirdsFemaleMalePhenotypePhylogenyRegression AnalysisReproductionSexual BehaviorSpecies SpecificitySurvival AnalysisTime Factorsmolecular evolutionpopulation geneticssexual conflicttranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID31038811
PMCPMC6618015
OpenAlexW2942908404

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.