ArticleJournal of digital imaging2019
Eye Tracking for Deep Learning Segmentation Using Convolutional Neural Networks.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Performance of Convolutional Neural Network Models in Meningioma Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neuroinformatics · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic Performance of a Next-Generation Virtual/Augmented Reality Headset: A Pilot Study of Diverticulitis on CT.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Eye Tracking-Enhanced Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysis: A Systematic Review on Data Efficiency, Interpretability, and Multimodal Integration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Variation within and between digital pathology and light microscopy for the diagnosis of histopathology slides: blinded crossover comparison study.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025Article
- Enhancing colorectal polyp classification using gaze-based attention networks.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Advances and prospects of multi-modal ophthalmic artificial intelligence based on deep learning: a review.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2024Review
- The Use of Machine Learning in Eye Tracking Studies in Medical Imaging: A Review.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2024Review
- Predicting Clinician Fixations on Glaucoma OCT Reports via CNN-Based Saliency Prediction Methods.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2024Article
- Visual Image Annotation for Bowel Obstruction: Repeatability and Agreement with Manual Annotation and Neural Networks.Journal of digital imaging · 2023Article
- AES-CSFS: an automatic evaluation system for corneal sodium fluorescein staining based on deep learning.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2023Article
- REFLACX, a dataset of reports and eye-tracking data for localization of abnormalities in chest x-rays.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Assessment of the Effect of Cleanliness on the Visual Inspection of Aircraft Engine Blades: An Eye Tracking Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Software-Based Method for Automated Segmentation and Measurement of Wounds on Photographs Using Mask R-CNN: a Validation Study.Journal of digital imaging · 2021Article
- Creation and validation of a chest X-ray dataset with eye-tracking and report dictation for AI development.Scientific data · 2021Article
- Integrating Eye Tracking and Speech Recognition Accurately Annotates MR Brain Images for Deep Learning: Proof of Principle.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2021Article
- A Practical Guide to Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Imaging Models in Scientific Literature.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
- Combined phacovitrectomy for retinal detachment and cataract-macular attachment and visual fixation as predictors of postoperative refractive error.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has experienced tremendous growth in multiple healthcare applications and has been shown to have high accuracy in semantic segmentation of medical (e.g., radiology and pathology) images. However, a key barrier in the required training of CNNs is obtaining large-scale and precisely annotated imaging data. We sought to address the lack of annotated data with eye tracking technology. As a proof of principle, our hypothesis was that segmentation masks generated with the help of eye tracking (ET) would be very similar to those rendered by hand annotation (HA). Additionally, our goal was to show that a CNN trained on ET masks would be equivalent to one trained on HA masks, the latter being the current standard approach. Step 1: Screen captures of 19 publicly available radiologic images of assorted structures within various modalities were analyzed. ET and HA masks for all regions of interest (ROIs) were generated from these image datasets. Step 2: Utilizing a similar approach, ET and HA masks for 356 publicly available T1-weighted postcontrast meningioma images were generated. Three hundred six of these image + mask pairs were used to train a CNN with U-net-based architecture. The remaining 50 images were used as the independent test set. Step 1: ET and HA masks for the nonneurological images had an average Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.86 between each other. Step 2: Meningioma ET and HA masks had an average DSC of 0.85 between each other. After separate training using both approaches, the ET approach performed virtually identically to HA on the test set of 50 images. The former had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88, while the latter had AUC of 0.87. ET and HA predictions had trimmed mean DSCs compared to the original HA maps of 0.73 and 0.74, respectively. These trimmed DSCs between ET and HA were found to be statistically equivalent with a p value of 0.015. We have demonstrated that ET can create segmentation masks suitable for deep learning semantic segmentation. Future work will integrate ET to produce masks in a faster, more natural manner that distracts less from typical radiology clinical workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.