ArticleMedicine2019
Carotid plaque magnetic resonance imaging and recurrent stroke risk: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiovascular risk factors and cervical carotid plaque features on CT angiography.The neuroradiology journal · 2022Article
- Black-Blood Contrast in Cardiovascular MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsCarotid atherosclerotic plaque is an important cause of carotid artery stenosis. The features of carotid atherosclerotic plaque detected by relevant magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), such as lipid core, plaque hemorrhage, and fibrous cap rupture, have been confirmed to be associated with the occurrence of the first cerebral ischemic event. Meanwhile, the features of carotid atherosclerotic plaque can be used as biomarkers to predict the occurrence of cerebral ischemic event. However, the mechanism of recurrent stroke is still unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis will be performed to summarize the association between features of carotid artery plaque detected by MRI and recurrent stroke, so as to find biomarkers that can predict recurrent stroke.
methodsElectronic search will be performed in PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) from inception to October 30, 2018. We will include cohort studies with an average follow-up time of >1 month in which lipid-rich/necrotic cores (LRNC), intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), and thinned or ruptured fibrous caps (TRFC) are associated with recurrent ipsilateral stroke or ischemic events. We will perform heterogeneity assessment before carrying out meta-analysis. According to the heterogeneity, we select random effect model or fixed effect model for meta-analysis of the included cohort studies.
resultsReview Manager 5.3 software will be used to calculate the combined hazard ratio value and 95% confidence interval (CI). This meta-analysis will provide high-quality data analysis of LRNC, IPH, and TRFC and ipsilateral recurrent stroke or ischemic events, including biomarkers as major predictors.
conclusionThe systematic review will provide evidence to assess the association between features of carotid plaque and ipsilateral recurrent stroke or ischemic events. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42019124043.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.