Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31048368›Full record

ArticleDiabetes2019

Topical Fluoxetine as a Novel Therapeutic That Improves Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice.

Chuong Minh Nguyen, Danielle Marie Tartar, Michelle Dawn Bagood, Michelle So, Alan Vu Nguyen, Anthony Gallegos, Daniel Fregoso, Jorge Serrano, Duc Nguyen, Doniz Degovics and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Skin on Drugs: Psychotropic Compounds in Cutaneous Biology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. A multi therapy bioelectronic wound dressing.npj biomedical innovations · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chuong Minh NguyenDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-3621-3190
Danielle Marie TartarDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Michelle Dawn BagoodDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Michelle SoDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Alan Vu NguyenDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Anthony GallegosDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Daniel FregosoDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Jorge SerranoDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Duc NguyenDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Doniz DegovicsDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Andrew AdamsDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Benjamin HarouniDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Jaime Joel FuentesDepartment of Biological Sciences, California State University, Sacramento, CA.
Melanie G GareauDepartment of Anatomy, Physiology, and Cell Biology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Robert William CrawfordDepartment of Biological Sciences, California State University, Sacramento, CA.
Athena M SoulikaDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Roslyn Rivkah IsseroffDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA rrisseroff@ucdavis.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7813-0858
University of California, Davis · USCalifornia State University, Sacramento · USVA Northern California Health Care System · USShriners Hospitals for Children - Northern California · US

Funding

UC Davis Biology ProgramR25GM056765 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI GOMES, ALDRIN V. · 1998 to 2019
$9.7M
Predoctoral Training in Pharmacological SciencesT32GM099608 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HELL, JOHANNES W · 2012 to 2021
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM056765NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM099608
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers represent a significant source of morbidity in the U.S., with rapidly escalating costs to the health care system. Multiple pathophysiological disturbances converge to result in delayed epithelialization and persistent inflammation. Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT]) and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine (FLX) have both been shown to have immunomodulatory effects. Here we extend their utility as a therapeutic alternative for nonhealing diabetic wounds by demonstrating their ability to interact with multiple pathways involved in wound healing. We show that topically applied FLX improves cutaneous wound healing in vivo. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that FLX not only increases keratinocyte migration but also shifts the local immune milieu toward a less inflammatory phenotype in vivo without altering behavior. By targeting the serotonin pathway in wound healing, we demonstrate the potential of repurposing FLX as a safe topical for the challenging clinical problem of diabetic wounds.

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalDiabetic FootDisease Models, AnimalFemaleFlow CytometryFluoxetineHumansMaleMiceReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSkinWound HealingFluoxetine

Identifiers

PMID31048368
PMCPMC6609984
OpenAlexW2942540986

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.