Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31049461›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2019

Comparison of linear periodized and non-periodized combined training in health markers and physical fitness of adults with obesity: Clinical trial protocol.

Anne Ribeiro Streb, Robert Passos da Silva, Larissa Dos Santos Leonel, Willen Remon Tozetto, Aline Mendes Gerage, Jucemar Benedet, Rodrigo Sudatti Delevatti, Tiago Turnes, Giovani Firpo Del Duca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anne Ribeiro StrebFederal University of Santa Catarina, Graduate Program in Physical Education, School of Sports, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Robert Passos da SilvaFederal University of Santa Catarina, Graduate Program in Physical Education, School of Sports, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Larissa Dos Santos LeonelFederal University of Santa Catarina, Graduate Program in Physical Education, School of Sports, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Willen Remon TozettoFederal University of Santa Catarina, Graduate Program in Physical Education, School of Sports, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Aline Mendes GerageFederal University of Santa Catarina, Graduate Program in Physical Education, School of Sports, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Jucemar BenedetFederal University of Santa Catarina, Graduate Program in Physical Education, School of Sports, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Rodrigo Sudatti DelevattiFederal University of Santa Catarina, Graduate Program in Physical Education, School of Sports, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Tiago TurnesFederal University of Santa Catarina, Graduate Program in Physical Education, School of Sports, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Giovani Firpo Del DucaFederal University of Santa Catarina, Graduate Program in Physical Education, School of Sports, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The literature discusses that combined training, aerobic more resistance exercises in the same session, is a suitable strategy for people with obesity and that exercise periodization leads to positive health outcomes; however, the implication of different periodizations of combined training for health outcomes in obese adults requires further investigation. The aim of the study will be to describe the methodology used to compare the effect of linear periodized and non-periodized combined training on health markers and health-related physical fitness in adults with obesity. This is a blinded randomized controlled clinical trial investigating adults with obesity in the age group 20-50 years. The sample will be non-probabilistic, and participants will be allocated randomly into one of three groups: control group (CG), non-periodized group (NG), and periodized group (PG). The intervention will occur in 60-min sessions, 3 days a week for 16 weeks, with 1 week dedicated to familiarization with the training and 15 weeks of combined training (aerobic followed by resistance in the same session). The PG group will perform three mesocycles of 5 weeks each, progressing in intensity throughout the intervention [aerobic: from 40-49% to 60-69% of heart rate reserve (HRR); strength: from 12 to 14 maximum repetitions (MR) to 8 to 10MR]; the NG group will maintain the same relative intensity throughout the study (aerobic: 50-59% of HRR; strength: 2 sets of 10-12 MR). Participants in the CG group will maintain their usual activities without the proposed intervention. Pre- and post-intervention assessments will be performed for biochemical markers, body composition, cardiovascular parameters, cardiorespiratory fitness, maximum upper and lower limb strength, flexibility, and subjective health-related parameters. This project was approved by the Committee of Ethics and Research with Human Beings of the institution of origin (protocol 2,448,674) and registered in the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (RBR-3c7rt3).

Indexed as

AdultsClinical trialExercise therapyObesityPhysical fitness

Identifiers

PMID31049461
PMCPMC6484285

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.