Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31055005›Full record

ReviewExperimental neurology2019

Toward development of clinically translatable diagnostic and prognostic metrics of traumatic brain injury using animal models: A review and a look forward.

Marzieh Hajiaghamemar, Morteza Seidi, R Anna Oeur, Susan S Margulies

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Research progress on biomarkers of traumatic brain injury.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marzieh HajiaghamemarWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: memar@gatech.edu.
Morteza SeidiWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
R Anna OeurWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Susan S MarguliesWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Objective Translational Multi-domain Early Concussion AssessmentR01NS097549 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ARBOGAST, KRISTY, MARGULIES, SUSAN SHEPS · 2017 to 2021
$4.5M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS097549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of cognitive and behavioral deficits in children in the US each year. There is an increasing interest in both clinical and pre-clinical studies to discover biomarkers to accurately diagnose traumatic brain injury (TBI), predict its outcomes, and monitor its progression especially in the developing brain. In humans, the heterogeneity of TBI in terms of clinical presentation, injury causation, and mechanism has contributed to the many challenges associated with finding unifying diagnosis, treatment, and management practices. In addition, findings from adult human research may have little application to pediatric TBI, as age and maturation levels affect the injury biomechanics and neurophysiological consequences of injury. Animal models of TBI are vital to address the variability and heterogeneity of TBI seen in human by isolating the causation and mechanism of injury in reproducible manner. However, a gap between the pre-clinical findings and clinical applications remains in TBI research today. To take a step toward bridging this gap, we reviewed several potential TBI tools such as biofluid biomarkers, electroencephalography (EEG), actigraphy, eye responses, and balance that have been explored in both clinical and pre-clinical studies and have shown potential diagnostic, prognostic, or monitoring utility for TBI. Each of these tools measures specific deficits following TBI, is easily accessible, non/minimally invasive, and is potentially highly translatable between animals and human outcomes because they involve effort-independent and non-verbal tasks. Especially conspicuous is the fact that these biomarkers and techniques can be tailored for infants and toddlers. However, translation of preclinical outcomes to clinical applications of these tools necessitates addressing several challenges. Among the challenges are the heterogeneity of clinical TBI, age dependency of some of the biomarkers, different brain structure, life span, and possible variation between temporal profiles of biomarkers in human and animals. Conducting parallel clinical and pre-clinical research, in addition to the integration of findings across species from several pre-clinical models to generate a spectrum of TBI mechanisms and severities is a path toward overcoming some of these challenges. This effort is possible through large scale collaborative research and data sharing across multiple centers. In addition, TBI causes dynamic deficits in multiple domains, and thus, a panel of biomarkers combining these measures to consider different deficits is more promising than a single biomarker for TBI. In this review, each of these tools are presented along with the clinical and pre-clinical findings, advantages, challenges and prospects of translating the pre-clinical knowledge into the human clinical setting.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticDisease Models, AnimalAnimalsBiomarkersHumansBiomarkersActigraphyBalance assessmentElectroencephalography (EEG)Eye trackingMulti-domain deficitsPanel of biomarkersPediatric traumatic brain injurySerum biomarkersTBI heterogeneityTranslational research

Identifiers

PMID31055005
PMCPMC6612432

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.