Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31059282›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes technology & therapeutics2019

Lag Time Remains with Newer Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology During Aerobic Exercise in Adults Living with Type 1 Diabetes.

Dessi P Zaharieva, Kamuran Turksoy, Sarah M McGaugh, Rubin Pooni, Todd Vienneau, Trang Ly, Michael C Riddell

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Glucose as a Biomarker for Stress in Firefighters.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dessi P Zaharieva1 Kinesiology and Health Science, Faculty of Health, Muscle Health Research Centre, York University, Toronto, Canada.
Kamuran Turksoy2 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois.
Sarah M McGaugh1 Kinesiology and Health Science, Faculty of Health, Muscle Health Research Centre, York University, Toronto, Canada.
Rubin Pooni1 Kinesiology and Health Science, Faculty of Health, Muscle Health Research Centre, York University, Toronto, Canada.
Todd Vienneau3 Insulet Canada Corporation, Oakville, Canada.
Trang Ly4 Insulet Corporation, Billerica, Massachusetts.
Michael C Riddell1 Kinesiology and Health Science, Faculty of Health, Muscle Health Research Centre, York University, Toronto, Canada.
York University · CAInsulet (United States) · USIllinois Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Time FactorsAdolescentAdultAgedAlgorithmsBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1ExerciseFemaleHumansHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin Infusion SystemsMaleBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinAccuracyContinuous glucose monitoringSelf-monitoring of blood glucoseSensorsTime lagType 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID31059282
PMCPMC6551983
OpenAlexW2944746936

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.