ArticleBiomedical optics express2018
Assessing the biomechanical properties of the porcine crystalline lens as a function of intraocular pressure with optical coherence elastography.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phantoms for use in optical coherence elastography.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Review
- Noninvasive quantitative assessment of oral submucosal fibrosisJournal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Effect of intraocular pressure on crystalline lens oscillations: a computational study using porcine eye model.PloS one · 2025Article
- Functional effects of the spatial-varying lens mechanical properties in accommodation.JPhys photonics · 2024Article
- Storage-induced mechanical changes of porcine lenses assessed with optical coherence elastography and inverse finite element modeling.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- The lens capsule significantly affects the viscoelastic properties of the lens as quantified by optical coherence elastography.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Co-axial acoustic-based optical coherence vibrometry probe for the quantification of resonance frequency modes in ocular tissue.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- High-Frequency Ultrasound Elastography to Assess the Nonlinear Elastic Properties of the Cornea and Ciliary Body.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2022Article
- Wave-based optical coherence elastography: The 10-year perspective.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2022Article
- Two-dimensional (2D) dynamic vibration optical coherence elastography (DV-OCE) for evaluating mechanical properties: a potential application in tissue engineering.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Characterization of natural frequencies from nanoscale tissue oscillations using dynamic optical coherence elastography.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- Multimodal quantitative optical elastography of the crystalline lens with optical coherence elastography and Brillouin microscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- Advances in Doppler optical coherence tomography and angiography.Translational biophotonics · 2019Article
- Simultaneously imaging and quantifyingAPL photonics · 2019Article
- Optical coherence elastography of cold cataract in porcine lens.Journal of biomedical optics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we investigated the relationship between the biomechanical properties of the crystalline lens and intraocular pressure (IOP) using a confocal acoustic radiation force (ARF) and phase-sensitive optical coherence elastography (OCE) system. ARF induced a small displacement at the apex of porcine lenses
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.