Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31070751›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2020

Cost-Utility of Early Breast Cancer Surveillance in Survivors of Thoracic Radiation-Treated Adolescent Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Jill Furzer, Lauren Tessier, David Hodgson, Cecilia Cotton, Paul C Nathan, Sumit Gupta, Petros Pechlivanoglou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Discrete-Event Simulation Modeling in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jill FurzerInstitute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lauren TessierInstitute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David HodgsonRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Cecilia CottonDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Paul C NathanInstitute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sumit GuptaInstitute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Petros PechlivanoglouInstitute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

NCTN BIQSFP ANBL1531 (NRT)U10CA180886 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI Douglas S. Hawkins · 2014 to 2026
$390.6M
COG SDMC - Statistics CoreU10CA180899 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TODD A ALONZO · 2014 to 2026
$132.8M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180886NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescent women treated for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are at increased risk of breast cancer (BC). We evaluate the cost-utility of eight high-risk BC surveillance strategies for this population, including the Children's Oncology Group guideline of same-day annual mammography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) beginning at age 25 years.

methodsA discrete event simulation model was used to simulate the life histories of a cohort of 500 000 25-year-old women treated for HL at age 15 years. We estimated BC incidence and mortality, life expectancy, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), health-care costs, and the relative cost-utility (incremental cost-utility ratio [ICUR]) under the eight assessed surveillance strategies. One-way sensitivity analysis enabled modeling of uncertainty evaluation. A publicly funded health-care payer perspective was adopted.

resultsCosts across the eight screening strategies ranged from $32 643 to $43 739, whereas QALYs ranged from 24.419 to 24.480. In an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis, annual mammography beginning at age 25 years was associated with an ICUR of $43 000/QALY gained, annual MRI beginning at age 25 years with a switch to annual mammography at age 50 years had an ICUR of $148 000/QALY, and annual MRI beginning at age 25 years had an ICUR of $227 222/QALY. Among all assessed surveillance strategies, the differences in life expectancy were small.

conclusionsCurrent high-risk BC surveillance guidelines do not reflect the most cost-effective strategy in survivors of adolescent HL. The results suggest that groups at high risk of BC may require high-risk surveillance guidelines that reflect their specific risk profile.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBreast NeoplasmsClinical Decision-MakingCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision TreesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHodgkin DiseaseHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMammographyModels, TheoreticalPublic Health SurveillanceQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID31070751
PMCPMC7825489

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.