ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2019
Next Generation Networks: Featuring the Potential Role of Emerging Applications in Translational Oncology.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of Two Exosomal miRNAs in Circulating Blood of Cancer Patients by Using Integrative Transcriptome and Network Analysis.Non-coding RNA · 2022Article
- A Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Ewing's Sarcoma.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Drug Research Meets Network Science: Where Are We?Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nowadays, networks are pervasively used as examples of models suitable to mathematically represent and visualize the complexity of systems associated with many diseases, including cancer. In the cancer context, the concept of network entropy has guided many studies focused on comparing equilibrium to disequilibrium (i.e., perturbed) conditions. Since these conditions reflect both structural and dynamic properties of network interaction maps, the derived topological characterizations offer precious support to conduct cancer inference. Recent innovative directions have emerged in network medicine addressing especially experimental omics approaches integrated with a variety of other data, from molecular to clinical and also electronic records, bioimaging etc. This work considers a few theoretically relevant concepts likely to impact the future of applications in personalized/precision/translational oncology. The focus goes to specific properties of networks that are still not commonly utilized or studied in the oncological domain, and they are: controllability, synchronization and symmetry. The examples here provided take inspiration from the consideration of metastatic processes, especially their progression through stages and their hallmark characteristics. Casting these processes into computational frameworks and identifying network states with specific modular configurations may be extremely useful to interpret or even understand dysregulation patterns underlying cancer, and associated events (onset, progression) and disease phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.