ArticleCurrent opinion in colloid & interface science2019
Design and Application of Stimulus-Responsive Droplets and Bubbles Stabilized by Phospholipid Monolayers.
Article in Current opinion in colloid & interface science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Highly Efficient Discovery of 3D Mechanical Metamaterials via Monte Carlo Tree Search.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Ginsenoside modified lipid-coated perfluorocarbon nanodroplets: A novel approach to reduce complement protein adsorption and prolongActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2024Article
- Elastocapillary deformation of thin elastic ribbons in 2D foam columns.Soft matter · 2022Article
- Efficient snap-through of spherical caps by applying a localized curvature stimulus.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2022Article
- Comprehensive review on ultrasound-responsive theranostic nanomaterials: mechanisms, structures and medical applications.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomimetic colloidal particles are promising agents for biosensing, but current technologies fall far short of Nature's capabilities for sensing, assessing, and responding to stimuli. Phospholipid-containing cell membranes are capable of binding and responding to an enormous variety of biomolecules by virtue of membrane organization and the presence of receptor proteins. By tuning the composition and functionalization of simulated membranes, soft colloids such as droplets and bubbles can be designed to respond to various stimuli. Moreover, because lipid monolayers can surround almost any hydrophobic phase, the interior of the colloid can be selected to provide a sensitive readout, for example in the form of optical microscopy or acoustic detection. In this work, we review some advances made by our group and others in the formulation of lipid-coated particles with different internal phases such as fluorocarbons, hydrocarbons, or liquid crystals. In some cases, binding or displacement of stabilizing lipids gives rise to conformational changes or disruptions in local membrane geometry, which can be amplified by the interior phase. In other cases, multivalent analytes can promote aggregation or even membrane fusion, which can be utilized for optical or acoustic readout. By highlighting a few recent examples, we hope to show that lipid monolayers represent an extremely versatile biosensing platform that can react to and detect biomolecules by leveraging the unique capabilities of phospholipid membranes.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.