Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31089283›Full record

ReviewBone marrow transplantation2020

Cord blood research, banking, and transplantation: achievements, challenges, and perspectives.

Hector Mayani, John E Wagner, Hal E Broxmeyer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hybrid umbilical cord blood banking: literature review.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hector MayaniOncology Research Unit, Oncology Hospital, National Medical Center, IMSS, Mexico City, Mexico. hmayaniv@prodigy.net.mx.
John E WagnerBlood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Hal E BroxmeyerDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Indiana University School of MedicineMexican Social Security Institute · MXUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Trial Design and Biostatistical Support CoreP01CA065493 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI J SUNIL RAO · 1995 to 2026
$48.2M
Project-005U54DK106846 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Reuben Kapur, Karen Elizabeth Pollok · 2015 to 2026
$9.7M
MECHANISMS OF SYNERGISTIC REGULATION OF STEM/PROGENITORSR01HL056416 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI BROXMEYER, HAL E. · 1996 to 2017
$6.0M
Enhancing Engraftment of Cord Blood by CD26 InhibitionR01HL112669 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI BROXMEYER, HAL E., FARAG, SHERIF S · 2012 to 2016
$3.6M
Controlling Influences of Oxygen Tension and CD26/DPP4 Enzymatic Activity on Regulation of Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells and Hematopoiesis During Health, Ageing, and DiseaseR35HL139599 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI BROXMEYER, HAL E. · 2018 to 2021
$3.1M
DEK Regulation of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Renewal, Fate, and HematopoiesisR01DK109188 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI BROXMEYER, HAL E., MARKOVITZ, DAVID MICHAEL · 2016 to 2019
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA065493NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL056416NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL112669NHLBI NIH HHS R35 HL139599NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK109188NIDDK NIH HHS U54 DK106846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first hematopoietic transplant in which umbilical cord blood (UCB) was used as the source of hematopoietic cells was performed in October 1988. Since then, significant achievements have been reported in terms of our understanding of the biology of UCB-derived hematopoietic stem (HSCs) and progenitor (HPCs) cells. Over 40,000 UCB transplants (UCBTs) have been performed, in both children and adults, for the treatment of many different diseases, including hematologic, metabolic, immunologic, neoplastic, and neurologic disorders. In addition, cord blood banking has been developed to the point that around 800,000 units are being stored in public banks and more than 4 million units in private banks worldwide. During these 30 years, research in the UCB field has transformed the hematopoietic transplantation arena. Today, scientific and clinical teams are still working on different ways to improve and expand the use of UCB cells. A major effort has been focused on enhancing engraftment to potentially reduce risk of infection and cost. To that end, we have to understand in detail the molecular mechanisms controlling stem cell self-renewal that may lead to the development of ex vivo systems for HSCs expansion, characterize the mechanisms regulating the homing of HSCs and HPCs, and determine the relative place of UCBTs, as compared to other sources. These challenges will be met by encouraging innovative research on the basic biology of HSCs and HPCs, developing novel clinical trials, and improving UCB banking both in the public and private arenas.

Indexed as

Cord Blood Stem Cell TransplantationNervous System DiseasesAdultBlood BanksChildFetal BloodHematopoietic Stem CellsHumans

Identifiers

PMID31089283
OpenAlexW2946308411

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.