Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31093693›Full record

ReviewCurrent genetics2019

A conserved role for transcription factor sumoylation in binding-site selection.

Emanuel Rosonina

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Regulation of lineage reprogramming by dynamic chromatin SUMOylation.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sumoylation regulates functional properties of the oocyte transcription factors SOHLH1 and NOBOX.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emanuel RosoninaDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada. rosonina@yorku.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6861-3143
York University · CA

Funding

CIHR MOP-142282Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-04208-2014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large numbers of eukaryotic transcription factors (TFs) are modified by SUMO post-translational modifications. Whereas the effect of TF sumoylation on the expression of target genes is largely context-dependent, it is not known whether the modification has a common function in regulating TFs throughout eukaryotic species. Here, I highlight four studies that used genome-wide chromatin-immunoprecipitation analysis (ChIP-seq) to examine whether sumoylation affects the selection of sites on the genome that are bound by human and yeast TFs. The studies found that impairing sumoylation led to deregulated binding-site selection for all four of the examined TFs. Predominantly, compared to wild-type forms, the sumoylation-deficient forms of the TFs bound to numerous additional non-specific sites, pointing to a common role for the modification in restricting TF binding to appropriate sites. Evidence from these studies suggests that TF sumoylation influences binding-site selection by modulating protein-protein interactions with other DNA-binding TFs, or by promoting conformational changes in the TFs that alter their DNA-binding specificity or affinity. I propose a model in which, prior to their sumoylation, TFs initially bind to chromatin with reduced specificity, which leads to spurious binding but also ensures that all functional sites become bound. Once the TFs are bound to DNA, sumoylation then acts to increase specificity and promotes release of the TFs from non-specific sites. The similar observations from these four genome-wide studies across divergent species suggest that binding-site selection is a general and conserved function for TF sumoylation.

Indexed as

SumoylationBasic-Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsBinding SitesChromatinChromatin Immunoprecipitation SequencingHumansMicrophthalmia-Associated Transcription FactorModels, BiologicalProtein BindingReceptors, AndrogenReceptors, GlucocorticoidRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription FactorsBasic-Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsChromatinMicrophthalmia-Associated Transcription FactorMITF protein, humanReceptors, AndrogenReceptors, GlucocorticoidRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSKO1 protein, S cerevisiaeTranscription FactorsBinding siteGene expressionSko1SumoylationTranscription factor

Identifiers

PMID31093693
OpenAlexW2946622120

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.