SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2019
Interventions for promoting participation in shared decision-making for children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review of shared decision-making interventions for people living with chronic respiratory diseases.BMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- Exploring motivations and resistances for implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: A systematic review based on a structure-process-outcome model.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Pooled it
- Development of a Tool to Measure the Dyadic Process of Shared Decision Making in Young Children: The Making Decisions for Kids (MADE for Kids) Survey.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2025Article
- Improving shared decision-making in bronchiectasis.BMJ open respiratory research · 2025Review
- Decision-making for children and adolescents: a scoping review of interventions increasing participation in decision-making.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Transition of care readiness among adolescents with chronic pain between 2021-2022 in a Nationally representative sample.The journal of pain · 2025Article
- Interventions to enhance the use of Evidence Based Decision Making for Quality Care among Nurses: A Systematic Review.The East African health research journal · 2024Review
- Racial, Lifestyle, and Healthcare Contributors to Perceived Cancer Risk among Physically Active Adolescent and Young Adult Women Aged 18-39 Years.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- How do we best engage young people in decision-making about their health? A scoping review of deliberative priority setting methods.International journal for equity in health · 2023Article
- Is mHealth a useful therapy for improving physical or emotional health in adolescents with cystic fibrosis? A systematic review.Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) · 2021Article
- The Case of Billy Best: 25 Years Later.Pediatrics · 2021Article
- Assessing Shared Decision-Making in Cystic Fibrosis Care Using collaboRATE: A Cross-Sectional Study of 159 Programs.Journal of patient experience · 2021Article
- Hearing the Voice of a Shadow Child: Healthy Siblings Experience of Cystic Fibrosis and Other Life-Threatening Conditions.Journal of patient experience · 2020Article
- The Impact of Mandala Coloring on Anxiety of Children with Cystic Fibrosis: A Randomized Trial.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
- Validation of a Process for Shared Decision-Making in Pediatrics.Academic pediatricsArticle
- Shared Decision-Making Tool for Self-Management of Home Therapies for Patients With Cystic Fibrosis.MDM policy & practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundShared decision-making is important in child and adolescent healthcare because there is growing international recognition of children and young people's rights to be included in decisions that affect them. In order for young people to participate effectively in shared decision-making they need to develop the skills of engagement with healthcare professionals and confidence in interacting with them. They also need to learn how to manage their condition and treatments on their own when they move into adulthood. Children and young people who participate in shared decision-making in healthcare are likely to be more informed, feel more prepared, and experience less anxiety about the unknown. Significant improvements in cystic fibrosis (CF) survival over recent decades, due to improved therapies and better management of care, means that young people with CF are routinely transitioning to adult healthcare where increasing emphasis on self-management brings greater complexity in decision-making. We need to know what interventions are effective in promoting shared decision-making for young people with CF.
objectivesTo assess the effectiveness of interventions that promote participation in shared decision-making for children and adolescents (aged between four and 18 years) with CF. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearches of journals and conference abstract books. We also searched the reference lists of articles and reviews addressing shared decision-making.Date of most recent search: 12 March 2019.We searched PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase (Elsevier), PsycINFO (EBSCO), WHO ICTRP, ASSIA (ProQuest), ERIC (ProQuest), ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We contacted study authors with published relevant research in shared decision-making for adults to ask if they were aware of any published or ongoing studies on the promotion of the intervention for children or adolescents (or both) with CF.Date of most recent search: 19 March 2019. SELECTION CRITERIA: We planned to include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (but not cross-over RCTs) of interventions promoting shared decision-making for children and adolescents with CF aged between four and 18 years, such as information provision, booklets, two-way interaction, checking understanding (by the participant), preparation to participate in a healthcare decision, decision-aids, and training interventions or educational programs. We planned to include interventions aimed at children or adolescents (or both), parents or healthcare professionals or any combination of these groups provided that the focus was aimed at promoting shared decision-making for children and adolescents with CF. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently reviewed papers identified in the searches. MAIN
resultsNo eligible RCTs were identified for inclusion in this systematic review. AUTHORS'
conclusionsWe were unable to identify RCTs with evidence which would support healthcare policy-making and practice related to implementation of shared decision-making for children and adolescents (aged between four and 18 years) with CF). We hope that having identified this gap in research, awareness will increase amongst researchers of the need to design high-quality shared decision-making interventions for young people with CF, perhaps adapted from existing models for adults, and to test these interventions and children's preferences in RCTs. It is also important to target health professionals with evidence-based education programmes on shared decision-making and a need for international consensus on addressing the variability in education programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.